Which of the following best analyzes the fragmentation of Sudan and South Sudan?(1 point)
Responses
South Sudan wanted to fragment because it benefited more from British colonialism than the rest of Sudan.
South Sudan wanted to fragment from Sudan because it won a civil war against it.
South Sudan wanted to fragment because of political oppression and cultural differences from the rest of Sudan.
South Sudan wanted to fragment because of economic advantages that they had over the rest of the country.
The best analysis of the fragmentation of Sudan and South Sudan is: South Sudan wanted to fragment because of political oppression and cultural differences from the rest of Sudan.
The best analysis of the fragmentation of Sudan and South Sudan is that South Sudan wanted to fragment from Sudan due to political oppression and cultural differences from the rest of Sudan.
To determine which option best analyzes the fragmentation of Sudan and South Sudan, we need to evaluate each response and consider the historical context.
Option 1 suggests that South Sudan wanted to fragment because it benefited more from British colonialism than the rest of Sudan. This statement does not align with the reasons for the fragmentation of Sudan and South Sudan. Colonialism did play a role in shaping the region but does not adequately explain the specific reasons for the split.
Option 2 proposes that South Sudan wanted to fragment from Sudan because it won a civil war against it. This response is partially correct. A major factor leading to the fragmentation was the Second Sudanese Civil War, fought between the Sudanese government and rebel forces primarily from the South led by the Sudan People's Liberation Army/Movement (SPLA/M). South Sudan ultimately gained independence through a referendum held in 2011, which resulted in the creation of the new nation.
Option 3 suggests that South Sudan wanted to fragment because of political oppression and cultural differences from the rest of Sudan. This response aligns with the key factors that contributed to the fragmentation of Sudan and South Sudan. Political oppression and cultural differences, along with longstanding grievances, were significant drivers behind the push for independence by South Sudan.
Option 4 proposes that South Sudan wanted to fragment because of economic advantages over the rest of the country. While there were economic disparities between South Sudan and Sudan, the economic advantages alone did not drive the desire for fragmentation. Political and cultural factors played more significant roles in the decision.
Based on the analysis, Option 3, which suggests that South Sudan wanted to fragment because of political oppression and cultural differences from the rest of Sudan, best captures the reasons behind the fragmentation of Sudan and South Sudan.