Evolutionary Distinctiveness and EDGE scores for mammals. This table shows Evolutionary Distinctiveness (ED) and EDGE scores for all species included in the mammal supertree [31] ranked by their EDGE score. Species that could not be assigned EDGE scores are appended to the bottom of the list, sorted by status and ED score. Species taxonomy follows Wilson & Reeder [35]. Red List categories follow the 2006 IUCN Red List [2]: CR = Critically Endangered, EN = Endangered, VU = Vulnerable, NT = Near Threatened, LC = Least Concern, CD = Conservation Dependent, DD = Data Deficient, NE = Not Evaluated. The NE category includes species in Wilson & Reeder [35] that could not be matched with any species or subspecies names in the Red List.
Click here for additional data file.(408K, pdf)
Table S2
Evolutionary Distinctiveness for primates under two species concepts. This table lists ED scores for primates under the biological species concept i[.e. the taxonomy of ref 35], the number of phylogenetic species into which the biological species was split [36] and the estimated ED score of each phylogenetic species. See Materials and Methods for further information. ED scores are lower for phylogenetic species than biological species, even for taxa whose taxonomic status is the same under both concepts (i.e. the number of phylogenetic species is one). This occurs because the total number of species in the phylogeny is greater, so each receives a smaller share of the distinctiveness of ancestral branches. ED scores were calculated using just one set of branch lengths (the ‘best’ set), so differ from those in table S1.
Extract only the main points for the information given above mentioned
- The table shows Evolutionary Distinctiveness (ED) and EDGE scores for mammal species.
- The species are ranked by their EDGE score, which is a measure of their conservation priority.
- The species taxonomy follows Wilson & Reeder.
- Red List categories are used to classify the conservation status of each species.
- Some species could not be assigned EDGE scores and are listed at the bottom of the table.
- There is also a table specifically for primates, which includes ED scores under the biological species concept and the number of phylogenetic species into which each biological species was split.
- ED scores are lower for phylogenetic species compared to biological species, even if their taxonomic status is the same under both concepts.
- This is because there are more total species in the phylogeny, so each one receives a smaller share of the ancestral branches' distinctiveness.
- The ED scores in the tables were calculated using one set of branch lengths.
The table shows Evolutionary Distinctiveness (ED) and EDGE scores for mammals, ranked by their EDGE score. The species taxonomy follows Wilson & Reeder [35]. The Red List categories are explained: CR = Critically Endangered, EN = Endangered, VU = Vulnerable, NT = Near Threatened, LC = Least Concern, CD = Conservation Dependent, DD = Data Deficient, NE = Not Evaluated. The table also includes species that could not be assigned EDGE scores, sorted by status and ED score. Additionally, there is a table specifically for primates under two species concepts, showing ED scores for each phylogenetic species split from the biological species. The ED scores for phylogenetic species are lower than for biological species due to the greater number of species in the phylogeny.
The table provided contains Evolutionary Distinctiveness (ED) and EDGE scores for mammal species. The species are ranked by their EDGE score. The taxonomy of the species follows Wilson & Reeder. The Red List categories indicate the conservation status of each species. Some species could not be assigned EDGE scores and are listed at the bottom, sorted by status and ED score.
Additionally, there is another table specifically for primates that shows ED scores under the biological species concept, the number of phylogenetic species that each biological species was split into, and the estimated ED score for each phylogenetic species. The ED scores for phylogenetic species are generally lower than those for biological species, even when their taxonomic status is the same. This is because the total number of species in the phylogeny is greater, resulting in a smaller share of distinctiveness for each species. The ED scores in this table were calculated using a specific set of branch lengths.
It is important to note that more detailed information can be found in the additional data file, which is not provided here.