Is the following statement a good definition? If so, write it as a biconditional. If not, explain why: An equilateral triangle is a triangle with three congruent sides.
Yes, the statement "An equilateral triangle is a triangle with three congruent sides" is a good definition. It can be written as a biconditional as follows:
An equilateral triangle is a triangle with three congruent sides if and only if a triangle has three congruent sides.
Yes, the statement is a good definition of an equilateral triangle.
To write it as a biconditional, we can say: "A triangle is an equilateral triangle if and only if it has three congruent sides."
Yes, the statement "An equilateral triangle is a triangle with three congruent sides" is a good definition. It accurately describes the characteristics of an equilateral triangle.
To write it as a biconditional, we can use the "if and only if" structure. The biconditional statement would be:
An equilateral triangle has three congruent sides if and only if it is a triangle.