The human factors theory of accident causation attributes accidents to a series of events ultimately caused by a mechanical hazard.true or false
False. The human factors theory of accident causation attributes accidents to a series of events ultimately caused by human error or unsafe acts. Mechanical hazards may contribute to accidents, but they are usually not the ultimate cause according to this theory.
False.
The human factors theory of accident causation attributes accidents to a chain of events that are primarily caused by human errors, rather than mechanical hazards. This theory suggests that accidents can be prevented by understanding and addressing the underlying human factors involved, such as communication breakdowns, lack of training, fatigue, stress, or complacency. Mechanical hazards may contribute to accidents, but they are not the primary focus of the human factors theory.
To determine if the statement is true or false, we need to understand the human factors theory of accident causation and its relationship with mechanical hazards.
The human factors theory of accident causation suggests that accidents occur as a result of multiple contributing factors, including human error, organizational failures, and unsafe working conditions. This theory focuses on understanding the role of humans in accident causation and aims to identify underlying factors that contribute to accidents.
In this context, the statement that the human factors theory of accident causation attributes accidents to a series of events ultimately caused by a mechanical hazard is false. The theory places emphasis on human factors rather than solely attributing accidents to mechanical hazards. While mechanical hazards can be one of many contributing factors, the theory recognizes that accidents are rarely caused by a single factor alone.
To summarize, the human factors theory of accident causation takes into consideration various factors, including human error, organizational failures, and unsafe conditions. While mechanical hazards can play a role, they are not the sole focus of the theory. Therefore, the statement is false.