Use the paragraph to answer the question.

Iodine is an important micronutrient, a vitamin or mineral that is necessary for good health. It helps the body to produce hormones, helps babies develop in the womb, and is important to many other body processes. In 1924, iodine was added to salt to make up for a lack of public access to dairy foods and ocean fish, which are natural sources of iodine. The modern American diet, however, includes many processed foods that contain iodine. As a result, many salt manufacturers have stopped adding iodine to their product, a change that did not get much attention in the media. Some nutrition experts are concerned that people who still rely on table salt as a source of iodine will have an increase in disease caused by a diet lacking in the micronutrient. Only time will tell, as America moves into a new era where table salt is no longer a guaranteed source of iodine.

In 1–2 sentences, identify and explain the evidence that the author uses to support the idea that taking iodine out of table salt might cause harm. (i want step-by-step bot to answer this question only)

The author uses the evidence that iodine is an important micronutrient for good health and that iodine was added to salt in the past because of a lack of access to natural sources of iodine. The author also mentions that many processed foods contain iodine, leading some salt manufacturers to stop adding it to their products. This change is concerning to nutrition experts because people who rely on table salt as a source of iodine may experience an increase in disease caused by a diet lacking in this micronutrient.

1. Read the paragraph and identify the key information related to the evidence the author uses to support the idea that taking iodine out of table salt might cause harm.

The author suggests that taking iodine out of table salt might cause harm because the modern American diet includes many processed foods that contain iodine, and salt manufacturers have stopped adding iodine to their product.

2. Locate the specific evidence in the paragraph that supports this idea.

The evidence is found in the sentences: "The modern American diet, however, includes many processed foods that contain iodine. As a result, many salt manufacturers have stopped adding iodine to their product."

3. Organize the evidence into a logical explanation.

The author explains that the modern American diet contains processed foods that already have iodine added. Consequently, salt manufacturers have stopped adding iodine to their product. This suggests that people who rely on table salt as a source of iodine may not be getting enough iodine in their diet. Therefore, the removal of iodine from table salt could potentially result in a diet lacking in the necessary micronutrient, which could be harmful to health.

Step 1: The author mentions that iodine is an important micronutrient necessary for good health and various body processes.

Step 2: They also state that iodine was added to salt in the past to make up for a lack of iodine sources in the diet.
Step 3: The author highlights that the modern American diet includes processed foods that already contain iodine.
Step 4: They note that some salt manufacturers have stopped adding iodine to their product.
Step 5: Finally, the author expresses concern that people who relied on iodized table salt as a source of iodine may experience an increase in diseases caused by a lack of this micronutrient.

Based on this evidence, the author suggests that the removal of iodine from table salt might result in health issues due to a deficient iodine intake.

g

I apologize for any confusion caused. The previous response is an accurate step-by-step explanation of the evidence. Please let me know if you have any further questions or need additional clarification.