Why is it the great society initiative considered a use of inherent power
Because the majority of Americans supported the program presented by President Johnson
Because Congress allowed the programs established by President Johnson’s in the great society to be enacted
Because the program implemented by President Johnson were powers reserved to the states
Because the actions that President Johnson took or justified by the vesting, and take care clause of the constitution
The actions taken by President Johnson in implementing the Great Society initiative were justified by the vesting and take care clauses of the constitution. These clauses grant the President inherent powers to carry out their duties and responsibilities. By implementing the Great Society programs, President Johnson was carrying out his duty to take care that the laws are faithfully executed, and he was using his inherent power to address the social and economic issues of the time.
The Great Society initiative is considered a use of inherent power because the actions taken by President Johnson were justified by the vesting and take care clause of the Constitution. The vesting clause, found in Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution, grants the executive power to the President. The take care clause, found in Article II, Section 3, requires the President to faithfully execute the laws.
President Johnson argued that the Great Society programs were necessary to address social and economic issues and promote the general welfare of the American people. He believed that it was his constitutional duty to take action through executive orders and other means to implement these programs.
In addition, Congress allowed the programs established by President Johnson's Great Society initiative to be enacted. This support from Congress further reinforced the use of inherent power in the implementation of these programs.
It is worth noting that the programs implemented by President Johnson also relied on powers reserved to the states, as they involved areas such as education, housing, and poverty alleviation, which traditionally fall under state jurisdiction.
The Great Society initiative is considered a use of inherent power for a few reasons:
1. Majority support: One reason is that the majority of Americans supported the program presented by President Johnson. In a democratic system, when a significant portion of the population supports a particular initiative, it can be seen as an exercise of inherent power.
2. Congressional approval: Another reason is that Congress allowed the programs established by President Johnson in the Great Society to be enacted. Congress has the power to legislate and make laws, and when it approves and supports a president's initiatives, it reinforces the idea of inherent power being used.
3. Reserved powers to the states: Additionally, some argue that the programs implemented by President Johnson were powers reserved to the states. The Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution stipulates that powers not delegated to the federal government are reserved for the states. As such, some view President Johnson's actions as an exercise of inherent power because they were not explicitly granted by the Constitution.
4. Constitutional justification: Lastly, some argue that the actions that President Johnson took were justified by the vesting and take care clauses of the Constitution. The vesting clause grants executive power to the President, which some interpret as allowing the President to take action when necessary for the benefit of the nation. The take care clause requires the President to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed," which some view as empowering the President to initiate programs and policies that serve the common good.
Overall, the Great Society initiative is considered a use of inherent power due to the combination of public support, congressional approval, the perception of reserved powers, and the constitutional justifications provided.