Which of these is an example of how conservationist views

could impact natural resource management? (1 point)
the passage of laws preserving a forest
the passage of laws allowing for harvesting of a forest, but
only if accompanied by replanting
the passage of laws mandating the planting of a forest
the passage of laws allowing for harvesting a forest and
building housing

The passage of laws preserving a forest is an example of how conservationist views could impact natural resource management.

The example that aligns with conservationist views on natural resource management is the passage of laws allowing for harvesting of a forest, but only if accompanied by replanting.

The correct answer is: the passage of laws allowing for harvesting of a forest, but only if accompanied by replanting.

To determine the correct answer, we need to understand what conservationist views and natural resource management entail.

Conservationists are individuals who advocate for the protection and preservation of natural resources, such as forests, wildlife, and water sources. They prioritize the sustainable use of these resources to ensure their long-term availability and minimize environmental impact.

Natural resource management is the practice of planning, implementing, and monitoring the use and protection of natural resources. It involves making informed decisions regarding the extraction, conservation, and restoration of resources to meet societal and ecological needs.

Considering these definitions, we can analyze the answer choices:

1. The passage of laws preserving a forest: This aligns with conservationist views as it aims to protect the forest from any form of exploitation or destruction. It would likely limit or prohibit activities like harvesting and building.

2. The passage of laws allowing for harvesting of a forest, but only if accompanied by replanting: This option reflects the impact of conservationist views on natural resource management. It acknowledges the need for resource use but ensures that it happens in a sustainable manner. By requiring replanting after harvesting, it ensures the forest's long-term sustainability.

3. The passage of laws mandating the planting of a forest: Although this option promotes afforestation, it does not directly address the conservation of existing natural resources. Instead, it focuses on creating new forests rather than managing the use of the current ones.

4. The passage of laws allowing for harvesting a forest and building housing: This choice goes against conservationist views since it permits the exploitation of natural resources without incorporating sustainability measures like replanting. It would likely prioritize economic development over environmental preservation.

Therefore, the most appropriate answer is "the passage of laws allowing for harvesting of a forest, but only if accompanied by replanting," as it integrates conservationist principles into natural resource management.