If a city fails to meet its threshold, what does this mean?

(1 point)
The population grew to such a number that it needed to be
considered a global city.
The population it provides for lives too far away for it to
remain relevant in the area.
The population levels of the area have exceeded its food
production for it to be viable.
It is not economically feasible for its market area to
purchase goods and services from it.

If a city fails to meet its threshold, it means that it is not economically feasible for its market area to purchase goods and services from it.

If a city fails to meet its threshold, it means that it is not economically feasible for its market area to purchase goods and services from it.

To understand what it means when a city fails to meet its threshold, we can analyze each option and determine the correct answer.

Option 1: "The population grew to such a number that it needed to be considered a global city." This option implies that the city has become significant enough to be classified as a global city due to its population growth. However, it does not necessarily relate to the city failing to meet its threshold. It is more about the city's growth and global recognition.

Option 2: "The population it provides for lives too far away for it to remain relevant in the area." This option suggests that the city's population is scattered or located far away, making it less influential or relevant within its surrounding area. However, it does not necessarily imply the city has failed to meet its threshold.

Option 3: "The population levels of the area have exceeded its food production for it to be viable." This option indicates that the population levels in the area have surpassed the city's food production capacity, making it unviable or unsustainable. However, this option only focuses on the food production aspect and does not encompass the entire concept of a city failing to meet its threshold.

Option 4: "It is not economically feasible for its market area to purchase goods and services from it." This option suggests that the city's market area cannot afford to purchase goods and services from the city, making it economically unfeasible. It aligns with the concept of a city failing to meet its threshold, as lack of economic viability can hinder a city's development and prosperity.

Therefore, the correct answer is Option 4: "It is not economically feasible for its market area to purchase goods and services from it." This option best represents the idea that a city fails to meet its threshold when its market area cannot afford to buy goods and services from the city.