On October 20, 1803, the Senate ratified the Louisiana Purchase Treaty by a vote of twenty-four to seven. The agreement, which provided for the purchase of the western half of the Mississippi River basin from France at a price of $15 million, or approximately four cents per acre, doubled the size of the country and paved the way for westward expansion beyond the Mississippi.QuestionBased on the excerpt, which of the following statements can be inferred about the effect the Louisiana Purchase would have on the United States?(1 point)ResponsesBecause of the high cost of the purchase, the United States would struggle even more with the public debt.Because of the high cost of the purchase, the United States would struggle even more with the public debt.Because of the treaty, the French could no longer pose a threat against the United States.Because of the treaty, the French could no longer pose a threat against the United States.Because of the purchase of the territory, Americans could now legally start settling regions in the West.Because of the purchase of the territory, Americans could now legally start settling regions in the West.Because of its ratification of the treaty, Congress confirmed that presidents had the power to purchase land.Because of its ratification of the treaty, Congress confirmed that presidents had the power to purchase land.

The nation could not afford another war so soon after the Revolution.

asnweR?

Because of the purchase of the territory, Americans could now legally start settling regions in the West.

"The subject to be regulated is commerce, and . . . it becomes necessary to settle the meaning of the word. The counsel for the appellee [party appealing to a higher court] would limit it to traffic, to buying and selling, or the interchange of commodities, and do not admit that it comprehends [includes] navigation. . . . All America understands, and has uniformly understood, the word "commerce" to comprehend navigation. It was so understood, and must have been so understood, when the Constitution was framed. . . .The word ‘among’ means intermingled with. A thing which is among others is intermingled with them. Commerce among the States cannot stop at the external boundary line of each State, but may be introduced into the interior.”—Chief Justice John Marshall, opinion of the court, Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)QuestionWhich of the following best summarizes this excerpt from John Marshall’s opinion?(1 point)ResponsesThe definition of commerce is differently interpreted by each state.The definition of commerce is differently interpreted by each state.The most important area involving commerce is in securing the national economy.The most important area involving commerce is in securing the national economy.The buying and selling of goods across state borders ought to fall under stricter laws.The buying and selling of goods across state borders ought to fall under stricter laws.The transportation and navigation of goods is part of the constitutional definition of commerce.

The transportation and navigation of goods is part of the constitutional definition of commerce.

Based on the excerpt, the following statement can be inferred about the effect the Louisiana Purchase would have on the United States: Because of the purchase of the territory, Americans could now legally start settling regions in the West.

Based on the excerpt, the statement that can be inferred about the effect the Louisiana Purchase would have on the United States is: "Because of the purchase of the territory, Americans could now legally start settling regions in the West."

This can be inferred from the information that the purchase provided for the acquisition of the western half of the Mississippi River basin, which doubled the size of the country. With this new territory, Americans would have the opportunity to legally settle and expand westward beyond the Mississippi.

Of the following choices, which ones influenced the emergence of opposing political parties? Select all that apply.(1 point)Responsesmounting pressure from Britain to further establish governmentmounting pressure from Britain to further establish governmentincrease in the distribution of newspapersincrease in the distribution of newspapersdifferences in opinion on how much power federal government should havedifferences in opinion on how much power federal government should havelooming threat of war with France

The choices that influenced the emergence of opposing political parties are:

- Increase in the distribution of newspapers
- Differences in opinion on how much power the federal government should have
- Looming threat of war with France

What was the purpose of Washington’s Neutrality Proclamation?(1 point)ResponsesHe wanted to remain neutral when defining his policy toward trade with Spain.He wanted to remain neutral when defining his policy toward trade with Spain.He wanted to spell out his policy for imposing taxes on imports and exports. He wanted to spell out his policy for imposing taxes on imports and exports. He wanted to make it clear that the U.S. supported neither France nor Britain in their war.He wanted to make it clear that the U.S. supported neither France nor Britain in their war.He wanted to remain neutral as his newly elected cabinet developed an economic plan.