According to Grant-Davie Rhetoric should never have a purpose.
Group of answer choices
True
False
False
False
To determine whether the statement "According to Grant-Davie, rhetoric should never have a purpose" is true or false, we need to understand Grant-Davie's perspective on rhetoric.
Charles Bazerman and David Russell introduced the concept of "purposeful rhetoric," which suggests that rhetoric is purpose-driven and aims to persuade an audience or achieve certain goals. Grant-Davie, in his article "The Purposes of Rhetoric," provides an alternative viewpoint.
Grant-Davie argues that rhetoric should not be limited to a single overarching purpose. Instead, he suggests that the purpose of rhetoric is contingent upon the specific rhetorical situation and context in which it is used. In other words, the purpose of rhetoric can vary depending on the particular communication and persuasive goals of a specific rhetorical situation.
Therefore, the statement "According to Grant-Davie, rhetoric should never have a purpose" is false. Grant-Davie's perspective allows for the understanding that rhetoric can have different purposes based on the specific rhetorical situation.