the following text talks about one of the threats to democracy in Philippines, how were the citizens of Philippines at the time positioned to believe: Rodrigo Duterte has dangerously lumped opposition figures with the Communist Party of the Philippines, which his government considers terrorist. Before the 2019 elections, he publicised a list of politicians who he claims were involved in illegal drug. For instance, he has attempted to imprison senator Antonio Trillanes who is most known for accusing Duterte and his family of hidden wealth.

The citizens of the Philippines were positioned to believe that Rodrigo Duterte's actions were a threat to democracy for several reasons. Firstly, Duterte had publicly associated opposition figures with the Communist Party of the Philippines, labeling them as terrorists. By lumping the opposition together with a group that is widely perceived as a threat to national security, Duterte created a narrative that further polarized the political environment.

Additionally, Duterte's government publicized a list of politicians allegedly involved in illegal drug activities prior to the 2019 elections. This move created a sense of suspicion and mistrust among the public, as the accusations were made without substantial evidence or due process. By using the issue of illegal drugs, which is a significant concern in the Philippines, Duterte attempted to discredit and tarnish the reputations of his political opponents.

One specific example of this was Duterte's attempt to imprison Senator Antonio Trillanes, who had accused Duterte and his family of hidden wealth. By targeting Trillanes, a prominent critic, Duterte sent a strong message to other opposition figures that dissent would not be tolerated. This move could have instilled fear among citizens and discouraged them from speaking out against Duterte and his policies.

Overall, Duterte's actions and rhetoric created an environment where opposition figures were labeled as terrorists or criminals, leading to a potential erosion of democratic values and principles in the Philippines.

To understand how citizens of the Philippines were positioned to believe that Rodrigo Duterte posed a threat to democracy, we need to analyze the different elements mentioned in the text.

1. Lumping opposition figures with the Communist Party: Duterte's government considered the Communist Party of the Philippines as a terrorist organization. By lumping the opposition figures with this group, Duterte created a perception that anyone opposing him or his policies was a threat to national security. This strategy aimed to discredit opposition voices and undermine their credibility.

2. Publicizing a list of politicians involved in illegal drugs: Duterte claimed that certain politicians were involved in illegal drug activities. By making these allegations public, he sought to tarnish the reputation of opposition figures and label them as criminals or corrupt individuals. This tactic aimed at destroying their credibility and weakening their influence among the public.

3. Attempting to imprison Senator Antonio Trillanes: Duterte targeted Senator Antonio Trillanes, who had accused Duterte and his family of hidden wealth. By attempting to imprison Trillanes, Duterte sent a message to other opposition figures that speaking out against him could have severe consequences. This action aimed to create a climate of fear and intimidation, discouraging others from challenging Duterte's rule.

Through these tactics, Duterte strategically positioned himself as a strong leader who could protect the country from external and internal threats. By associating opposition figures with terrorism and criminal activities, he manipulated public opinion to view him as the only viable option to maintain law and order. This positioning created a narrative that undermined democracy by stifling dissent and consolidating power.

The citizens of the Philippines at the time were positioned to believe that Rodrigo Duterte posed a threat to democracy due to several factors:

1. Lumpenization of opposition figures: Duterte had dangerously classified opposition figures along with the Communist Party of the Philippines, which the government considers to be a terrorist group. By associating the opposition with a perceived threat, he aimed to undermine their credibility and influence.

2. Publicized list of politicians involved in illegal drugs: Prior to the 2019 elections, Duterte shared a list of politicians that he claimed were involved in illegal drug activities. This tactic aimed to vilify his political opponents and create distrust among the public towards these politicians.

3. Imprisonment attempt on Senator Antonio Trillanes: Duterte attempted to imprison Senator Antonio Trillanes, who is known for accusing Duterte and his family of hidden wealth. By targeting a prominent opposition figure, Duterte aimed to suppress dissent and deter others from criticizing him or his administration.

These actions by Duterte created an environment that positioned the citizens of the Philippines to believe that he was using his power to silence opposition and undermine the democratic process. By associating opposition figures with terrorism and criminal activities, Duterte sought to discredit and marginalize his political opponents, thereby consolidating his power and weakening the foundations of democracy.