Which of the following explains the effect the kingdom of Ghana’s kings had on the fall of the empire?(1 point) Responses They supported an aggressive trade policy. They supported an aggressive trade policy. Their support of slavery led to a slave revolt. Their support of slavery led to a slave revolt. Their absolute power led to a popular revolt. Their absolute power led to a popular revolt. Their decision not to convert to Islam led to conflicts with their neighbors.
Their absolute power led to a popular revolt.
The effect the kingdom of Ghana's kings had on the fall of the empire can be explained by their absolute power leading to a popular revolt.
To determine which option explains the effect the kingdom of Ghana's kings had on the fall of the empire, we need to examine each response and analyze its potential impact.
1) "They supported an aggressive trade policy." This response suggests that the kings' support for an aggressive trade policy might have contributed to the empire's downfall. By engaging in extensive trade, Ghana may have been vulnerable to economic instability, resource depletion, or external pressures.
2) "Their support of slavery led to a slave revolt." This response suggests that the kings' endorsement of slavery might have triggered a revolt among enslaved individuals. The mistreatment and exploitation of slaves could have sparked resistance and destabilized the kingdom.
3) "Their absolute power led to a popular revolt." This response suggests that the kings' absolute power might have caused a popular revolt. If the kings ruled with oppressive measures or failed to address grievances from the population, it could have incited rebellion.
4) "Their decision not to convert to Islam led to conflicts with their neighbors." This response suggests that the kings' choice to maintain traditional religious practices instead of converting to Islam may have resulted in conflicts with neighboring states. Religious differences could have fueled tensions and warfare.
After considering these options, it seems that option 2, "Their support of slavery led to a slave revolt," does not accurately explain the effect of Ghana's kings on the empire's fall, as they did not directly mention any slave revolt in the historical context. Therefore, the option that best explains the effect the kingdom of Ghana's kings had on the fall of the empire is option 1, "They supported an aggressive trade policy." By engaging in aggressive trading practices, the kingdom may have weakened its economy and left itself vulnerable to external pressures, contributing to its decline.