How did the collapse of fisheries over the last 50 years challenge older views of the ocean? (1 point)
• People used to believe that the earth was smaller than it is.
People used to believe that fisheries would collapse if they were not intensely fished by humans.
• People used to believe that the ocean and its resources were inexhaustible
• People used to believe that the Atlantic Ocean bordered Asia.
• People used to believe that the ocean and its resources were inexhaustible
The collapse of fisheries over the last 50 years challenged the older view that the ocean and its resources were inexhaustible. This view was held by many people who believed that the ocean had an unlimited supply of fish that could be harvested without consequences. However, the collapse of fisheries, where fish populations drastically declined or even disappeared, showed that this belief was incorrect.
To understand how the collapse of fisheries challenged this view, one could examine scientific research and data on the topic. This could involve reviewing studies, reports, and statistics on fish populations and fishing practices over the past 50 years. These sources could provide information on the decline in fish stocks, as well as the various factors contributing to this collapse, such as overfishing, habitat destruction, pollution, and climate change.
By analyzing this information, one could identify the patterns and trends that led to the collapse of fisheries. This could involve studying the impact of excessive fishing pressure on fish populations, the ecological effects of removing key species from marine ecosystems, and the long-term consequences of unsustainable fishing practices.
Furthermore, it would also be important to consider the perspectives of scientists, researchers, and experts in the field of marine biology and fisheries management. These individuals can provide insights into the causes and consequences of the collapse of fisheries and explain how it challenges the older view of the ocean and its resources being inexhaustible.
Overall, getting a comprehensive understanding of the collapse of fisheries and its implications for the older views of the ocean would involve gathering and analyzing scientific data, reviewing research studies, and consulting with experts in the field.
The collapse of fisheries over the last 50 years has challenged the older view that:
• People used to believe that the earth was smaller than it is.
• People used to believe that fisheries would collapse if they were not intensely fished by humans.
• People used to believe that the ocean and its resources were inexhaustible.
• People used to believe that the Atlantic Ocean bordered Asia.
Specifically, the collapse of fisheries has revealed that the ocean's resources are not limitless or inexhaustible as previously believed. It has demonstrated that overfishing and unsustainable fishing practices can lead to the depletion of fish populations and the collapse of fisheries. This challenges the idea that fisheries could sustain intense fishing efforts indefinitely without negative consequences.
Furthermore, the collapse of fisheries has also highlighted the interconnectedness of ocean ecosystems and the global nature of this issue. Fish populations, migratory patterns, and ecosystems transcend national borders, underscoring the need for international cooperation and sustainable management practices to ensure the long-term health and viability of fisheries.
In summary, the collapse of fisheries over the past 50 years has forced a shift in the understanding of the ocean and its resources, challenging previously held beliefs about their size, inexhaustibility, and the consequences of intensive fishing practices.