How does this Section of the Constitution support Checks and Balances?
(1 point)
Responses
The President must get the approval of the states
The President must get the approval of the states
The Constitution requires that the President’s actions be reviewed by the courts
The Constitution requires that the President’s actions be reviewed by the courts
The Constitution requires that the President’s nominations to the Supreme Court be approved by the Senate.
The Constitution requires that the President’s nominations to the Supreme Court be approved by the Senate.
Federalism requires that powers be shared between state and federal governments
The correct answer is:
The Constitution requires that the President's nominations to the Supreme Court be approved by the Senate.
This section of the Constitution supports checks and balances by ensuring that the President's power to appoint Supreme Court justices is balanced by the Senate's power to approve or reject those nominations. This helps to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful by requiring the President to gain the approval of another branch before making significant appointments.
The correct answer is:
The Constitution requires that the President’s nominations to the Supreme Court be approved by the Senate. This supports checks and balances because it ensures that the President does not have unilateral authority in appointing Supreme Court justices, as the Senate has the power to approve or reject these nominations. This helps prevent one branch of government from becoming too powerful and provides a system of checks and balances between the executive and legislative branches.
To determine how this section of the Constitution supports checks and balances, we need to carefully analyze the options provided and identify the relationship between them and the principle of checks and balances.
Option 1: "The President must get the approval of the states."
This statement does not directly relate to checks and balances. While the President interacts with states on various matters, such as federal funding or enforcement of federal policies, requiring the President's approval from states does not specifically address the concept of checks and balances.
Option 2: "The Constitution requires that the President’s actions be reviewed by the courts."
This statement aligns with checks and balances. Under the principle of checks and balances, each branch of government has the power to oversee and limit the actions of the other branches. The judicial branch, represented by the courts, reviews the actions of the President to ensure they align with constitutional principles and do not exceed the President's authority.
Option 3: "The Constitution requires that the President’s nominations to the Supreme Court be approved by the Senate."
This statement is also connected to checks and balances. The President nominates individuals for judicial positions, including Supreme Court justices, but their appointment is subject to the approval of the Senate. This process helps ensure that the President's appointments are checked by another branch of government – in this case, the legislative branch – providing a system of balance and shared power.
Option 4: "Federalism requires that powers be shared between state and federal governments."
While federalism establishes a division of powers between the state and federal governments, it is not directly related to checks and balances. The principle of federalism seeks to distribute authority and prevent any one level of government from dominating others, but it does not specifically address the checks and balances between the branches of the federal government.
Based on the analysis above, option 2 ("The Constitution requires that the President’s actions be reviewed by the courts") and option 3 ("The Constitution requires that the President’s nominations to the Supreme Court be approved by the Senate") appear to be the correct responses as they align with the concept of checks and balances.