How did Texans work around Article 13?(1 point)
Responses
They made the Mexican government agree to honor labor contracts.
They made the Mexican government agree to honor labor contracts.
They ignored the new laws in Article 13.
They ignored the new laws in Article 13.
They asked the government to change its mind.
They asked the government to change its mind.
They lied to the government about when enslaved people were born.
They lied to the government about when enslaved people were born.
To understand how Texans worked around Article 13, which refers to a provision in the Mexican Constitution of 1824, we can examine the responses provided:
1. They made the Mexican government agree to honor labor contracts.
This response suggests that Texans negotiated with the Mexican government to ensure that labor contracts, including those involving enslaved people, were honored despite the restrictions imposed by Article 13. Texans may have used diplomacy or other means of persuasion to influence the government's decision.
2. They ignored the new laws in Article 13.
This response indicates that some Texans simply disregarded Article 13 and continued to operate as they had before the provision was enacted. They may have chosen to overlook or defy the restriction on owning enslaved individuals, possibly due to their disagreement with the law or a desire to maintain their economic interests.
3. They asked the government to change its mind.
This response suggests that Texans actively approached the government and made formal requests for a revision or repeal of Article 13. This approach would involve engaging in political negotiations, lobbying, or presenting persuasive arguments to convince the government to reconsider or modify the provision.
4. They lied to the government about when enslaved people were born.
This response implies that Texans may have resorted to deception to circumvent the restrictions of Article 13. By misrepresenting the ages of enslaved individuals, Texans could claim they were exempt from the law's prohibitions, which applied to those born after 1824. This strategy would involve falsifying records or providing false information about birth dates.
It is important to note that these responses are neither an endorsement nor a condemnation of the actions described. Rather, they provide different possibilities for how Texans might have navigated the challenges posed by Article 13.