Now that you have an additional $300, revise your inequality from part a to reflect your new spending limit. Solve this inequality.
Let's assume the inequality from part a was:
x + 1250 ≤ 1750
Now, we will revise the inequality to reflect the new spending limit of $300, which means our total budget would be $1750 + $300 = $2050.
x + 1250 ≤ 2050
To solve this inequality, we first subtract 1250 from both sides:
x ≤ 2050 - 1250
Simplifying further:
x ≤ 800
Therefore, the solution to the revised inequality is x ≤ 800. This means that the maximum amount the person can spend is $800 in order to stay within their new spending limit.
To revise the inequality, we need to set a new spending limit of $300. Let's assume the original inequality was:
x <= 500
To reflect the new spending limit, we subtract the additional $300 from both sides of the inequality:
x - 300 <= 500 - 300
Simplifying the equation:
x - 300 <= 200
Now we can solve for x by isolating the variable:
x <= 200 + 300
x <= 500
Therefore, the revised inequality is x <= 500 and the solution is x can take any value less than or equal to 500.
To revise your inequality, we'll need to incorporate the new spending limit, which is an additional $300. Let's assume your original spending limit was represented by the variable "x".
The original inequality, without the additional $300, can be written as: x ≤ original spending limit
To reflect the new spending limit, we need to increase the original spending limit by $300. Therefore, the revised inequality would be: x ≤ original spending limit + $300
Now, to solve this inequality, you need to know the value of the original spending limit. Once you have that value, you can substitute it into the inequality and solve for x.
For example, if your original spending limit was $500, the revised inequality would be: x ≤ $500 + $300
Simplifying, we get: x ≤ $800
This means that your new spending limit, including the additional $300, is $800 or less.