Which statement is a sound reason to support a leash law for dogs?(1 point)
Responses
I am afraid of dogs and do not like seeing them in the park.
I am afraid of dogs and do not like seeing them in the park.
Some leashes are pretty and can display an owner's personality.
Some leashes are pretty and can display an owner's personality.
Everyone else I know lives in a town with a leash law.
Everyone else I know lives in a town with a leash law.
Leashed dogs are less likely to bother other dogs and humans.
Leashed dogs are less likely to bother other dogs and humans.
The statement "Leashed dogs are less likely to bother other dogs and humans" is a sound reason to support a leash law for dogs.
The statement "Leashed dogs are less likely to bother other dogs and humans" is a sound reason to support a leash law for dogs. This is because a leash law ensures that dogs are kept under control and restricted to a certain area, reducing the likelihood of them approaching or bothering other dogs and humans.
To arrive at this answer, you would evaluate each statement and determine if it provides a valid reason for supporting a leash law. The first two statements are not relevant to the topic of having a leash law for dogs and involve personal preferences. The third statement of everyone else living in a town with a leash law does not provide a reasonable argument for having a leash law in a particular location. However, the fourth statement clearly states a valid reason by highlighting the benefit of leashed dogs being less likely to cause trouble for other dogs and humans, making it a sound reason to support a leash law.