LOW —> L” O” W” looks like a translation what two moves could replace the one translation a A.) reflection across intersecting lines, B.) a reflection across parallel lines, C.) a reflection across penperdicular lines or D a counterclockwise rotation of 180 degrees
The correct answer would be C) a reflection across perpendicular lines.
To determine which moves could replace the translation LOW —> L" O" W", we need to understand the characteristics of each possible transformation.
A) Reflection across intersecting lines: This involves reflecting the figure across a point where two lines intersect. In the given scenario, there are no intersecting lines involved, so this move is not applicable.
B) Reflection across parallel lines: This transformation requires reflecting the figure across parallel lines. For the given translation, the letters L, O, and W are moved in the same direction, so a reflection across parallel lines would not recreate the original translation. Thus, this move is also not applicable.
C) Reflection across perpendicular lines: This transformation involves reflecting the figure across lines that intersect at a right angle. Since there are no perpendicular lines involved in the given translation, this move is not applicable.
D) Counterclockwise rotation of 180 degrees: This move involves rotating the figure 180 degrees in a counterclockwise direction. If we perform a 180-degree counterclockwise rotation on the word LOW, we would obtain the letters W, O, L, which is different from the given translation L" O" W". Therefore, this move would not replace the translation.
In conclusion, none of the provided moves (A, B, C, or D) can replace the translation LOW —> L" O" W".