Jason is moving out of the apartment that he has rented for almost two years. He has been a fairly good tenant and tried to keep the apartment in decent condition, though his dogs did scratch the flooring pretty severely, and there are multiple holes in the walls. When Jason asks for his security deposit back, the landlord tells him that he will not be getting it back. What is the MOST likely reason that Jason will not be getting his deposit back? (1 point) Responses The landlord will use it to make repairs to the apartment where Jason damaged it. The landlord will use it to make repairs to the apartment where Jason damaged it. The landlord doesn’t like Jason and wants to keep the money. The landlord doesn’t like Jason and wants to keep the money. The landlord already spent Jason’s deposit months ago and has no money to give him. The landlord already spent Jason’s deposit months ago and has no money to give him. The landlord will use it to pay the last month’s rent.
The landlord will use it to make repairs to the apartment where Jason damaged it.
The MOST likely reason that Jason will not be getting his deposit back is that the landlord will use it to make repairs to the apartment where Jason damaged it. This is a common practice for landlords, as they are entitled to use the security deposit to cover the cost of repairing any damages beyond normal wear and tear. In this case, the severe scratching on the flooring and multiple holes in the walls would likely qualify as damages that require repair.
The MOST likely reason that Jason will not be getting his deposit back is: The landlord will use it to make repairs to the apartment where Jason damaged it.
