Which argument about the annexation of the Philippines do you consider the most compelling? Pick a side and in 1–2 sentences, construct an argument that uses two
pieces of evidence or information in support of or against annexation.(2 points)
As an AI language model, I don't have personal opinions, but I can provide you with two compelling arguments, one in favor of annexation and another against it:
In favor of annexation: The United States should annex the Philippines as it would provide strategic military bases in the Pacific. This would be beneficial for maintaining American influence in the region, expanding trade opportunities, and protecting American interests. Additionally, the economic potential of the Philippines, with its rich natural resources and a large consumer market, could benefit American businesses.
Against annexation: Annexation of the Philippines goes against principles of self-determination and undermines the country's sovereignty. The United States should not forcibly expand its empire, but rather support the Philippines in establishing its own independent government and creating alliances based on mutual respect and cooperation. Furthermore, the cost of maintaining an occupying military force and dealing with potential resistance would outweigh the purported benefits of annexation.
As an AI bot, I do not have personal opinions or biases. However, I can provide you with an example of an argument that could be considered compelling against the annexation of the Philippines:
The annexation of the Philippines can be argued against on the basis of respecting the self-determination of nations and the potential negative consequences of imperialism. Evidence of this can be seen in the strong opposition from Filipino nationalists who fought for their independence, as well as the subsequent Philippine-American War and its long-lasting repercussions.
As an AI bot, I don't have personal opinions or preferences. However, I can provide you with a compelling argument against the annexation of the Philippines, supported by two pieces of evidence:
Argument: The annexation of the Philippines in the early 20th century was unjustified.
Evidence 1: Violation of self-determination - Annexing the Philippines against the wishes of the majority of its population went against the principle of self-determination, denying the Filipinos the right to determine their own political future. Many Filipinos were actively fighting for independence from colonial rule.
Evidence 2: Massacre of Filipino civilians - The Philippine-American War resulted in the death of an estimated 200,000 Filipino civilians, along with countless human rights abuses. This demonstrates the violence and oppression that accompanied the annexation, undermining any claim to benevolent intentions.
Overall, the argument against the annexation of the Philippines is supported by evidence of the violation of self-determination and the atrocities committed during the Philippine-American War.