An archaeologist uncovers some bones the he suspects belonged to a relative of today's modern horse. What is the Best method of testing this belief?
*
1 point
Perform a cytochrome c comparison of the two subjects.
Create a model of bones from similar burial sites.
Perform a DNA comparison of the two subjects.
Create a model showing the two organisms side by side.
The best method of testing the belief that the uncovered bones belonged to a relative of today's modern horse is to perform a DNA comparison of the two subjects. This method allows for a direct analysis of the genetic material and can provide concrete evidence of their relationship.
The best method of testing the belief that the uncovered bones belonged to a relative of today's modern horse would be to perform a DNA comparison of the two subjects. This method would involve extracting and analyzing the DNA from the bones of the uncovered specimen and comparing it to the DNA of modern horses. By comparing the genetic information, scientists can determine the likelihood of a genetic relationship between the two organisms.
The best method of testing the archaeologist's belief that the uncovered bones belonged to a relative of today's modern horse would be to perform a DNA comparison of the two subjects. This method would involve analyzing the DNA sequences of both the discovered bones and the DNA of known modern horse relatives, such as existing horse species or other horse fossils with established relationships. The DNA comparison would help determine the genetic similarity between the two subjects, providing evidence of their relatedness.
To perform a DNA comparison, the archaeologist would first need to extract DNA from the discovered bones. This process typically involves collecting a small sample of bone material, isolating the DNA, and then amplifying specific DNA regions for analysis. Once the DNA has been extracted and amplified, it can be compared to existing DNA sequences of modern horses or other horse relatives.
This comparison would involve aligning the DNA sequences to identify similarities and differences. The more DNA similarities found between the two subjects, the stronger the evidence supporting the hypothesis that the uncovered bones belong to a relative of today's modern horse.
It is important to note that the other options mentioned (cytochrome c comparison, creating a model of bones from similar burial sites, and creating a model showing the organisms side by side) would not provide direct evidence of genetic relatedness and would therefore be less effective in testing the belief. While these methods could provide additional information and context, a DNA comparison is the most direct and accurate approach for determining the genetic relationship between different organisms.