Why did southerners resist the increase tariff in 1828 are you in it should be nullified
Many Southerners strongly resisted the increase in tariff imposed by the Tariff of 1828, also known as the Tariff of Abominations. The main reason behind this resistance was the belief that the tariff disproportionately favored Northern manufacturing and industrial interests at the expense of Southern agricultural interests. Here are some specific reasons for the Southern resistance:
1. Economic Impact: The Southern economy heavily relied on agriculture, particularly cotton and tobacco. The higher tariff meant increased prices on imported goods and manufacturing equipment needed for their agricultural operations. This meant that Southern farmers and planters had to pay more for essential goods while receiving lower prices for their exports, which adversely affected their profits. They saw this as unjust and detrimental to their economic wellbeing.
2. Sectional Disparities: Southerners viewed the tariff as another example of the growing sectional disparities between the North and the South within the United States. They believed that the North was using its political power to exploit the South economically. The tariff was seen as a means for the Northern industrialists to protect their manufacturing industry and maintain dominance in the national economy.
3. Nullification Doctrine: In response to the tariff, some Southerners, particularly in South Carolina, embraced the idea of nullification. Nullification was the belief that states had the right to declare federal laws within their borders null and void if they deemed them unconstitutional. This idea was rooted in the belief of states' rights and was seen as a way to resist what Southerners perceived as an unfair federal policy.
4. Political Discontent: The tariff issue also sparked political discontent among Southerners. They felt that their political representation and influence in Congress were diminishing, and the tariff further contributed to their frustration. This discontent would eventually contribute to the widening divide between the North and the South, leading to the eventual secession and the American Civil War.
It is worth noting that as the debate continued, some compromises were reached to appease the Southern opposition. For example, the Tariff of 1832 slightly reduced the tariff rates from the Tariff of 1828, but it was still not satisfactory to many Southerners. Ultimately, the controversy surrounding the tariff issue contributed to the ongoing tensions between the North and the South.
The increase in tariff that occurred in 1828, known as the Tariff of Abominations, led to significant resistance from Southerners for a variety of reasons. Here are the step-by-step explanations:
1. Economic Impact: The tariff disproportionately affected the southern states, as they relied heavily on imports for their manufacturing and farming industries. The increased import duties made foreign goods more expensive, hurting Southern businesses and consumers.
2. Disadvantageous to the South: Southerners argued that the tariff primarily benefited the Northern industrial states. The revenue generated from the tariff was used to fund internal improvements and protect Northern industries. This created an imbalance, as the South felt their economic interests were being ignored.
3. Agricultural Dependence: The Southern economy was largely dependent on agricultural products, such as cotton. The tariff raised prices on manufactured goods, including necessary farming equipment, making it more difficult and expensive for Southern planters to maintain their agricultural operations.
4. Nullification: In response to the Tariff of Abominations, the state of South Carolina initiated the concept of nullification. Nullification argued that states had the right to declare a federal law unconstitutional and, therefore, null and void within their borders. Southerners believed that nullification would protect their economic interests and assert states' rights.
5. John C. Calhoun: Calhoun, a prominent Southern politician, was a vocal supporter of nullification and became the chief advocate for the South's resistance to the tariff. Calhoun argued that the tariff violated the principles of limited government and was an abuse of power by the federal government.
6. Compromise: To avoid a potential crisis, Congress passed the Tariff of 1832, which slightly reduced the overall tariff rates. However, Southerners were still dissatisfied, and South Carolina proceeded with its nullification efforts, leading to a tense standoff with the federal government.
7. Henry Clay's Compromise Tariff: In 1833, Henry Clay proposed a compromise tariff known as the Compromise Tariff of 1833. This tariff gradually reduced the rates over time, satisfying the concerns of the South. In return, South Carolina agreed to repeal its nullification ordinance, preventing an escalation of the conflict.
In conclusion, Southerners resisted the increase in tariff in 1828, primarily due to its negative economic impact on their region and the perception that it favored the North. This resistance led to the concept of nullification, a key issue that fueled tensions between the federal government and states' rights advocates in the early 19th century.
The Southerners resisted the increase in tariff in 1828, which is also known as the Tariff of Abominations, for several reasons. The tariff disproportionately affected Southern states because they relied heavily on imported goods, particularly manufactured goods from Europe. The increased tariffs threatened the Southern economy by making imported goods more expensive and less competitive with domestically produced goods from the North.
To understand why the Southerners resisted this tariff, you can follow these steps:
1. Research the Tariff of Abominations: Start by researching and understanding the specifics of the 1828 tariff. Look into the details of how it was structured, which goods were affected, and the rates imposed.
2. Analyze the economic impact: Examine the economic consequences of this tariff, particularly its effects on Southern states. Explore the industries and goods that were affected, and how the increased tariffs impacted their competitiveness and profitability.
3. Understand the Southern economy: Get familiar with the Southern economy of that time, specifically their dependence on imported goods. Consider the agricultural practices prevalent in the South and their reliance on trade for manufactured goods.
4. Explore sectionalism and political dynamics: Look into the broader political context of that era. Investigate the sectionalism between the North and South, including their different economic interests, ideologies, and political alliances. Consider how the tariff was perceived as a sign of growing Northern power and dominance.
5. Study nullification: Look into the concept of nullification, which was the idea that states had the right to declare a federal law null and void if they believed it was unconstitutional. Explore the arguments put forth by prominent Southern politicians, such as John C. Calhoun, who advocated for nullification as a response to the tariff.
By following these steps and conducting research on the Tariff of Abominations, the economic impact on the South, the political dynamics of the time, and the concept of nullification, you will gain a comprehensive understanding of why Southerners resisted the increase in the tariff in 1828.