Which statement best analyzes how Lemon v. Kurtzman clarified the meaning of the First Amendment?(1 point)
Responses
It set the standard for what it meant for government to violate the Establishment Clause.
It set the standard for what it meant for government to violate the Establishment Clause.
It introduced the idea that religion should be separate from government.
It introduced the idea that religion should be separate from government.
It decided that the Establishment Clause enabled the government to give funding to all religious organizations equally.
It decided that the Establishment Clause enabled the government to give funding to all religious organizations equally.
It determined that the Establishment Clause was not violated if funding was used for secular purposes.
The correct answer is:
It determined that the Establishment Clause was not violated if funding was used for secular purposes.
The statement that best analyzes how Lemon v. Kurtzman clarified the meaning of the First Amendment is: "It set the standard for what it meant for government to violate the Establishment Clause."
The correct answer is:
It determined that the Establishment Clause was not violated if funding was used for secular purposes.
Lemon v. Kurtzman was a Supreme Court case decided in 1971 that dealt with the issue of government funding for religious schools. In this case, the Court established a three-part test, known as the Lemon test, to determine whether government actions violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
The Lemon test consists of three prongs:
1. The government action must have a secular purpose.
2. The government action must not have the primary effect of advancing or inhibiting religion.
3. The government action must not result in excessive entanglement between government and religion.
The case clarified that government funding could be provided to religious organizations as long as the primary purpose of the funding was for secular, non-religious purposes. It also emphasized the importance of maintaining a separation between religion and government.