What was the significance of Shays’ Rebellion?(1 point)
Responses
Farmers got more money for their farms from the government
Farmers got more money for their farms from the government
Farmers had a cause to join
Farmers had a cause to join
It was a sign that the Articles of Confederation did not work
It was a sign that the Articles of Confederation did not work
It was the first time farmers rebelled against the government
It was a sign that the Articles of Confederation did not work
The significance of Shays' Rebellion was that it was a sign that the Articles of Confederation did not work.
The correct answer is: It was a sign that the Articles of Confederation did not work.
To understand the significance of Shays' Rebellion, it is important to know the context. Shays' Rebellion was an armed uprising that took place in Massachusetts in 1786 and 1787. The rebellion was led by Daniel Shays, a former Revolutionary War captain, and primarily involved farmers and rural laborers who were struggling with debts and economic hardships.
During the rebellion, the farmers protested against high taxes and heavy debts that they were unable to repay due to the economic depression following the Revolutionary War. They also demanded changes to the state's legal system, which heavily favored the creditors. The rebellion escalated to the point where the farmers attempted to seize the Springfield Armory in an effort to secure military weapons.
The significance of Shays' Rebellion lies in the fact that it exposed the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, the first governing document of the United States. The rebellion demonstrated the inability of the government under the Articles to effectively respond to domestic unrest and enforce laws and order.
Furthermore, the rebellion highlighted the need for a stronger central government that could address economic issues, maintain social stability, and protect property rights. This led to calls for a new constitution, which ultimately resulted in the drafting and ratification of the United States Constitution in 1787.
So, the correct answer is: It was a sign that the Articles of Confederation did not work.