The conclusion to Doug's essay on the importance of arts education in schools reads, "While not every student will grow up to become an artist, 1.4% of working Americans are artists." Which rewrite would improve his conclusion?(1 point)

Responses

Artists are very important, and we should encourage more of them.
Artists are very important, and we should encourage more of them.

We teach health even though only 0.7% of working Americans are doctors, yet 1.4% of working Americans are artists.
We teach health even though only 0.7% of working Americans are doctors, yet 1.4% of working Americans are artists.

No improvement is needed.
No improvement is needed.

While not every student will grow up to become an artist, making and appreciating art can enrich every life.
While not every student will grow up to become an artist, making and appreciating art can enrich every life.

While not every student will grow up to become an artist, making and appreciating art can enrich every life.

While not every student will grow up to become an artist, making and appreciating art can enrich every life.

The rewrite that would improve Doug's conclusion is: "While not every student will grow up to become an artist, making and appreciating art can enrich every life." This rewrite provides a more comprehensive and meaningful perspective on the importance of arts education. It emphasizes that even if not everyone becomes a professional artist, engaging in art can still have a positive impact on individuals' lives. This broader view strengthens the argument for arts education in schools.