The United States Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona held that criminal confessions cannot be used in a court case unless the suspect was fully informed of his or her rights, in order to uphold the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution.
Question
Use the passage to answer the question.
What was a long-term effect of this decision?
(1 point)
Responses
Police in Arizona were forced to release suspects upon arrest.
Police in Arizona were forced to release suspects upon arrest.
Police nationwide were trained to read suspects their rights upon arrest.
Police nationwide were trained to read suspects their rights upon arrest.
Police in Arizona relied more on evidence than on confessions.
Police in Arizona relied more on evidence than on confessions.
Police nationwide relied more on evidence than on confessions.
Police nationwide were trained to read suspects their rights upon arrest.
The long-term effect of the Miranda v. Arizona decision was that police nationwide were trained to read suspects their rights upon arrest.
Correct answer: Police nationwide were trained to read suspects their rights upon arrest.
Explanation: The long-term effect of the Miranda v. Arizona decision was that police nationwide were trained to read suspects their rights upon arrest. This is because the Supreme Court held that confessions made without the suspect being fully informed of his or her rights would be inadmissible in court. In order to comply with this ruling, police departments across the country were required to inform arrested suspects of their Miranda rights, which include the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. This was done to ensure that suspects were aware of their constitutional rights before any questioning took place.