Which of the following statements best explains why the addition of a bill of rights was necessary to ensure ratification of the Constitution?(1 point) Responses The Federalists were distrustful of a national bill of rights being used by states. The Federalists were distrustful of a national bill of rights being used by states. The Federalists were fearful of a too powerful national government. The Federalists were fearful of a too powerful national government. The Anti-Federalists were fearful of a too powerful national government. The Anti-Federalists were fearful of a too powerful national government. The Anti-Federalists were distrustful of state governments. The Anti-Federalists were distrustful of state governments.
The correct statement that best explains why the addition of a bill of rights was necessary to ensure ratification of the Constitution is: The Anti-Federalists were fearful of a too powerful national government. The Anti-Federalists were distrustful of state governments.
The addition of a bill of rights was necessary to ensure ratification of the Constitution because the Anti-Federalists were fearful of a too powerful national government and distrustful of state governments.
The statement that best explains why the addition of a bill of rights was necessary to ensure ratification of the Constitution is: "The Anti-Federalists were fearful of a too powerful national government." The Anti-Federalists, who opposed the Constitution, argued that it gave too much power to the central government and that there was a need for specific protections for individual rights. They believed that without a bill of rights, the national government could potentially infringe on the rights and liberties of the people. Consequently, to gain the support of the Anti-Federalists and ensure the ratification of the Constitution, the Federalists agreed to add a bill of rights that would guarantee certain rights and protections to the citizens.
