Why is the author's response to potential objections inadequate?
Responses
It answers the traffic concern with a flippant rhetorical question rather than meaningfully addressing the issue.
Pick the answer below.
It does not sufficiently emphasize the environmental benefits of the plan to build underground storm-water storage tanks.
Pick the answer below.
In favoring the environment, the response betrays the author's bias against the community's use of automobiles.
Pick the answer below.
It answers the traffic concern with a flippant rhetorical question rather than meaningfully addressing the issue.
To determine why the author's response to potential objections is inadequate, it would be helpful to have access to the specific response or objection being discussed. However, based on the provided choices, the most appropriate selection would be:
It answers the traffic concern with a flippant rhetorical question rather than meaningfully addressing the issue.
To determine why the author's response to potential objections is inadequate, we need to analyze the provided options. Let's assess each option and explain how to arrive at the correct answer:
1. "It answers the traffic concern with a flippant rhetorical question rather than meaningfully addressing the issue."
To verify if this response is correct, we should examine the author's actual response to the objection about traffic. Look for instances in the text where the author discusses traffic and assess if their response genuinely addresses the concern. If the author's response is dismissive or lacks substance, this option could be the correct answer.
2. "It does not sufficiently emphasize the environmental benefits of the plan to build underground storm-water storage tanks."
To ascertain if this option is correct, we should analyze the author's discussion of the environmental benefits of the proposed plan. Determine if the author adequately emphasizes these benefits or if their response falls short by not providing enough information or support regarding the environmental advantages. If the response lacks emphasis or fails to adequately address this aspect, this option might be the correct answer.
3. "In favoring the environment, the response betrays the author's bias against the community's use of automobiles."
To establish if this answer is correct, we need to examine the author's response for indications of bias against the community's use of automobiles. Check the author's argumentation and assess if their response contains unfavorable or prejudiced remarks about the community's reliance on cars. If the response demonstrates a biased stance towards automobile usage, this option would then be the correct choice.
By carefully scrutinizing the author's responses, we should be able to determine the option that best explains why the response is inadequate.