Jefferson should move forward with its plan to build storm-water storage tanks underground beneath Becker Boulevard. These tanks will allow sewer overflow during storms to be safely stored until it can be properly treated. Currently, sewer overflow runs directly into Jefferson Bay, where it wreaks havoc on the water quality. This is not only detrimental to fish and other wildlife in the bay, but also causes the water to emit offensive odors. Opponents of the plan complain that it will shut down traffic on Becker Boulevard for several months. But what's a little traffic headache compared to a cleaner environment?

Question

Jefferson should move forward with its plan to build storm-water storage tanks underground beneath Becker Boulevard. These tanks will allow sewer overflow during storms to be safely stored until it can be properly treated. Currently, sewer overflow runs directly into Jefferson Bay, where it wreaks havoc on the water quality. This is not only detrimental to fish and other wildlife in the bay, but also causes the water to emit offensive odors. Opponents of the plan complain that it will shut down traffic on Becker Boulevard for several months. But what's a little traffic headache compared to a cleaner environment?

Why is the author's response to potential objections inadequate?
Responses

It answers the traffic concern with a flippant rhetorical question rather than meaningfully addressing the issue.
Pick the answer below.

It does not sufficiently emphasize the environmental benefits of the plan to build underground storm-water storage tanks.
Pick the answer below.

In favoring the environment, the response betrays the author's bias against the community's use of automobiles.

Answer 1

It dismisses the concerns of opponents by suggesting that the inconvenience of traffic is insignificant compared to the benefits of a cleaner environment.

Answer 2

The author's response to potential objections is inadequate because it does not sufficiently emphasize the environmental benefits of the plan to build underground storm-water storage tanks.

Answer 3

The correct answer is:

It answers the traffic concern with a flippant rhetorical question rather than meaningfully addressing the issue.

Explanation:
The author's response to potential objections is inadequate because it dismisses the traffic concern with a flippant rhetorical question, rather than addressing it in a meaningful way. While the author does mention that opponents of the plan complain about traffic on Becker Boulevard being shut down for several months, their response only downplays the concern without providing any real solution or explanation. This can be seen as dismissive and not addressing the issue at hand.