How were indentured servants different from slaves? (1 point)
Slaves were paid a small wage and indentured servants were forced to work for no money.
Indentured servants agreed to work for no money in exchange for land and tools after a certain period of time, while slaves were forced to work indefinitely.
Indentured servants worked indefinitely and slaves agreed to work for five years in exchange for freedom at the end of the five years.
Indentured servants earned wages but slaves did not.
Use the excerpt to answer the question.
Based on the provided excerpt, it can be inferred that the correct answer is:
Indentured servants agreed to work for no money in exchange for land and tools after a certain period of time, while slaves were forced to work indefinitely.
Based on the information provided, the correct answer is:
Indentured servants agreed to work for no money in exchange for land and tools after a certain period of time, while slaves were forced to work indefinitely.
The excerpt provided does not specifically address the differences between indentured servants and slaves, so we will have to rely on our knowledge to answer the question.
Indentured servants and slaves were both forms of unfree labor used in different contexts. However, there were some key differences between them:
1. Indentured servants agreed to work for a specific period of time, usually ranging from four to seven years, in exchange for passage to the New World, as well as food, clothing, and shelter. Once their term was completed, they were promised land and tools to start a new life. On the other hand, slaves had no such agreement and were considered property, bound to their owners for life.
2. Indentured servants had a contractual agreement, where they willingly entered into a labor contract in exchange for various benefits. Slaves, on the other hand, were forcefully taken captive or born into slavery without any choice or contractual agreement.
3. Indentured servants were typically from lower social classes in Europe and voluntarily entered into agreements to seek better economic opportunities in the New World. Slaves, however, were primarily African captives who were forcibly brought to the Americas.
4. Indentured servants had certain legal rights, such as the ability to sue their masters for mistreatment or breach of contract. Slaves, in contrast, had no legal rights and were considered the property of their owners, with no legal protections.
In summary, while both indentured servants and slaves provided labor without full freedom, the key distinctions lie in the voluntary nature of indentured servitude, the time-limited nature of an indentured servant's labor, and the contractual agreement and promised benefits for indentured servants.