The Universe Unit Test
12 of 1312 of 13 Items
Question
In three to five sentences, evaluate the scientific evidence that supports the big bang theory and the steady state theory.(4 points)
Short Answer Rubric (4 points)
Points Awarded Criteria
4
The answer is very clear.
The answer is fully supported by details.
There may be a few errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics. Errors do not interfere with meaning.
3
The answer is mostly clear.
The answer is supported by mostly relevant details.
There are a few errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics. Errors do not interfere with meaning.
2
The answer is somewhat clear.
Details are weak or not related.
There are some errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics. Errors interfere with meaning.
1
The answer is not clear.
There are few or no supporting details.
There are many errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics. Errors interfere with meaning.
0 The question is not answered.
Skip to navigation
page 1 of 1
The big bang theory is supported by several lines of scientific evidence. The observation of the cosmic microwave background radiation, which is a remnant of the early universe, is one of the strongest pieces of evidence for the big bang. Additionally, the large-scale distribution of galaxies and the observed expansion of the universe are consistent with the predictions of the big bang theory.
On the other hand, the steady state theory has been largely discredited and is not supported by as much scientific evidence. The theory proposed that the universe is continuously creating matter to maintain its density. However, observations of the cosmic microwave background radiation and the distribution of galaxies do not support the idea of a continuously expanding and replenishing universe.
Overall, the scientific evidence strongly supports the big bang theory as the most accurate explanation for the origin and evolution of the universe.
To evaluate the scientific evidence that supports the Big Bang theory, one can look at several key pieces of evidence. One significant piece of evidence is the observation of cosmic microwave background radiation, which is believed to be the afterglow of the Big Bang. This radiation is found in every part of the universe and is consistent with the predictions of the Big Bang theory. Another piece of evidence is the observed redshift in distant galaxies, which suggests that the universe is expanding. Additionally, the abundance of light elements in the universe, such as hydrogen and helium, is consistent with what would be expected from the conditions of the early universe.
On the other hand, the steady state theory was an alternative viewpoint to the Big Bang theory. However, the steady state theory lacks strong scientific evidence and has generally fallen out of favor in the scientific community. The lack of observed new matter creation and the absence of a consistent explanation for the observed redshift in distant galaxies are some of the weaknesses of the steady state theory. The scientific evidence supporting the Big Bang theory is generally considered to be more robust and extensive compared to the evidence for the steady state theory.
To answer this question and evaluate the scientific evidence that supports the big bang theory and the steady state theory, you need to consider the following:
1. Big Bang Theory: The big bang theory suggests that the universe began as a singularity, a point of infinite density and temperature, approximately 13.8 billion years ago. One line of evidence supporting this theory is the observation of the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB). The CMB is a faint radiation that permeates the entire universe and is believed to be the afterglow of the early hot and dense phase of the universe.
Additionally, the abundance of light elements, such as hydrogen and helium, observed in the universe also aligns with the predictions of the big bang theory. The distribution and redshift of galaxies further support this theory, as they indicate that the universe is expanding.
2. Steady State Theory: The steady state theory argues that the universe has no beginning or end and has always existed in a state of equilibrium. This theory has less scientific evidence supporting it compared to the big bang theory. One of the main criticisms of the steady state theory is the lack of a plausible explanation for the cosmic microwave background radiation. The observation of this radiation strongly favors the big bang theory.
In conclusion, the big bang theory has substantial scientific evidence supporting it, such as the CMB radiation and the observed expansion of the universe. The steady state theory, on the other hand, lacks convincing evidence and faces challenges in explaining certain observed phenomena.