Which BEST explains why it is hard to tell what kind of 3D art prehistoric societies had?
(1 point)
Prehistoric societies were focused on survival and had little use for art.
Many materials used to make art dissolve over time.
It is very hard to get any information about prehistoric societies.
Prehistoric societies didn't value 3D art, so they didn't create it.
Many materials used to make art dissolve over time.
The best explanation for why it is hard to tell what kind of 3D art prehistoric societies had is that many materials used to make art dissolve over time.
The correct answer is: Many materials used to make art dissolve over time.
To understand why it is difficult to determine the kind of 3D art prehistoric societies had, we need to consider the nature of the materials they used. Prehistoric societies primarily created art using perishable materials such as wood, bone, and natural pigments. These materials are susceptible to decomposition and decay over time.
Due to the passage of thousands of years, many of these perishable materials have dissolved or deteriorated, leaving behind little evidence of the original 3D art forms. The survival of prehistoric art is largely dependent on the environment in which it was preserved, such as caves or waterlogged areas that can protect organic materials from decay.
Archaeologists and researchers face challenges in obtaining a comprehensive understanding of prehistoric art due to the limited surviving examples. Nevertheless, through various methods of study and analysis, including the examination of surviving artifacts, cave paintings, and sculptures, as well as comparative analysis with art from contemporary societies, scholars continue to piece together a broader understanding of the 3D art created by prehistoric societies.