Which of the following best explains the development of banana republics?(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0APowerful governments take political control of weaker countries to gain territory.%0D%0APowerful governments take political control of weaker countries to gain territory.%0D%0A%0D%0AA powerful country conquers weaker neighbors to create buffer zones for its defense.%0D%0AA powerful country conquers weaker neighbors to create buffer zones for its defense.%0D%0A%0D%0AExternal economic influence and internal political corruption combine to exploit the resources of poor countries.%0D%0AExternal economic influence and internal political corruption combine to exploit the resources of poor countries.%0D%0A%0D%0ACountries allow for the creation of independent enclaves within its borders to take advantage of resources.
The correct answer is:
External economic influence and internal political corruption combine to exploit the resources of poor countries.
The most accurate explanation for the development of banana republics is:
"External economic influence and internal political corruption combine to exploit the resources of poor countries."
This means that banana republics are characterized by a situation where external economic forces exert influence and control over a weaker country, while internal political corruption allows for the exploitation of the country's resources.
The best explanation for the development of banana republics is that external economic influence and internal political corruption combine to exploit the resources of poor countries. Banana republics are typically characterized by the dominance of foreign corporations and economic dependency on the production and export of a single commodity, such as bananas.
To arrive at this answer, you can eliminate the options that don't match the characteristics and historical context of banana republics. The first option, "Powerful governments take political control of weaker countries to gain territory," is not directly related to the exploitation of resources in poor countries. The second option, "A powerful country conquers weaker neighbors to create buffer zones for its defense," also doesn't capture the economic exploitation aspect of banana republics.
The last option, "Countries allow for the creation of independent enclaves within its borders to take advantage of resources," is somewhat relevant, but it doesn't consider the external economic influence that is typically involved.
Therefore, the correct explanation for the development of banana republics is that external economic influence and internal political corruption combine to exploit the resources of poor countries.