which of the following explains the effects of sundiata keita’s establishment of trading outposts and caravanserais? the kingdom of mali quick check

1. these actions helped create a social class system in Mali that hurt the economy.
2. These actions helped strengthen Malis economy, because it made trading easier.
3 these actions contributed to hyperinflation in many economies outside of mali
4 these actions meant that Mali lost control of powerful trading cities such as goa and timbuktu

2. These actions helped strengthen Malis economy, because it made trading easier.

The correct answer is:

2. These actions helped strengthen Mali's economy because it made trading easier.

Sundiata Keita's establishment of trading outposts and caravanserais in the kingdom of Mali facilitated trade and improved economic activities. This expansion of trade routes and infrastructure made trading easier and more efficient, which ultimately contributed to the strengthening of Mali's economy.

To determine the correct answer, we need to analyze the effects of Sundiata Keita’s establishment of trading outposts and caravanserais in the context of the Kingdom of Mali.

Option 1 states that these actions helped create a social class system in Mali that hurt the economy. However, there is no evidence or logical connection between trading outposts and caravanserais and the creation of a social class system. Additionally, it is not mentioned whether this social class system would hurt or benefit the economy. So, we can eliminate option 1.

Option 3 suggests that these actions contributed to hyperinflation in many economies outside of Mali. The establishment of trading outposts and caravanserais would not have a direct effect on inflation in other economies. This option is unsupported and can be eliminated.

Option 4 claims that these actions meant that Mali lost control of powerful trading cities such as Goa and Timbuktu. This statement is incorrect because Timbuktu was actually one of the major trading cities under the Kingdom of Mali. So, we can eliminate option 4 as well.

This leaves us with option 2: These actions helped strengthen Mali's economy because it made trading easier. This option aligns with the historical context and the purpose of establishing trading outposts and caravanserais. By improving trading infrastructure, Mali would have facilitated trade routes and made it easier for goods to be exchanged, potentially leading to economic growth.

Therefore, option 2 is the most plausible explanation for the effects of Sundiata Keita’s establishment of trading outposts and caravanserais in the Kingdom of Mali.