Explain how historians would characterize the use of executive orders for the first 100 years of American presidential history.(1 point) Responses For the first 100 years of American history, despite significant societal changes, presidents deferred to congressional lawmaking to adapt to change. For the first 100 years of American history, despite significant societal changes, presidents deferred to congressional lawmaking to adapt to change. There was very little change in the first 100 years of American history, making the need for executive orders very small. There was very little change in the first 100 years of American history, making the need for executive orders very small. There were significant changes, such as the Second Industrial Revolution and the Great Depression, and Congress was unwilling to act. There were significant changes, such as the Second Industrial Revolution and the Great Depression, and Congress was unwilling to act. For the first 100 years of American history, presidential employment of executive orders was the highest in American history. For the first 100 years of American history, presidential employment of executive orders was the highest in American history.

For the first 100 years of American history, despite significant societal changes, presidents deferred to congressional lawmaking to adapt to change.

The correct answer is: For the first 100 years of American history, despite significant societal changes, presidents deferred to congressional lawmaking to adapt to change.

To determine how historians would characterize the use of executive orders for the first 100 years of American presidential history, we can examine historical records and the context of the time. Here are the possible responses and explanations:

1) "For the first 100 years of American history, despite significant societal changes, presidents deferred to congressional lawmaking to adapt to change."

This response suggests that during the first century of American history, presidents relied on Congress to address societal changes and make laws accordingly. Rather than issuing executive orders, they deferred to congressional lawmaking.

To verify this information, historians would analyze the historical record, including the legislative actions taken during this period. They would examine the roles and responsibilities of the president and Congress and assess instances where executive orders were used.

2) "There was very little change in the first 100 years of American history, making the need for executive orders very small."

This response implies that there were minimal changes occurring during the first century of American history, which would result in a lesser need for executive orders. However, this statement may not accurately reflect the reality of significant changes that did occur during this time, such as the expansion westward, territorial acquisitions, and the Civil War.

Historians would study the historical context of this period and assess the societal, political, and economic changes to determine the accuracy of this characterization.

3) "There were significant changes, such as the Second Industrial Revolution and the Great Depression, and Congress was unwilling to act."

This response acknowledges the occurrence of significant changes during the first 100 years of American history. It suggests that in certain instances, Congress was unwilling or unable to address these changes, potentially leading presidents to employ executive orders to respond to these issues.

Historians would examine evidence of significant changes during this time period, legislative actions taken, and any instances where executive orders were used to evaluate the accuracy of this characterization.

4) "For the first 100 years of American history, presidential employment of executive orders was the highest in American history."

This response suggests that presidents used executive orders more frequently during the first century of American history than in any other time period.

To verify this claim, historians would analyze historical records, examining the number and nature of executive orders issued by presidents during this period. They would compare these findings to other time periods to assess the accuracy of this characterization.

Ultimately, historians would rely on historical evidence and analysis to determine how executive orders were utilized during the first 100 years of American presidential history.