Which of the following best describes why Mohammad the second to continue to trade with the genoese, despite their alliance with the byzantines
A)Genoa was also a Muslim kingdom and it’s similar faith made it a natural Ally
B) the Genoese betrayed the byzantines so the ottomans trusted them
C) they were already trading partners
De Mohammad the second understood the importance and benefits of maintaining trade with the Genoese just as the byzantines understood
C) they were already trading partners
The best answer is C) they were already trading partners. Mohammad the second continued to trade with the Genoese because they already had an existing trading relationship. This suggests that trade was important to both parties and they saw the benefits of maintaining this economic alliance, regardless of other geopolitical factors such as the Genoese alliance with the Byzantines. The other options (A and B) do not provide a strong enough rationale to explain why Mohammad the second would continue to trade with the Genoese.
To determine the correct answer, let's analyze the given options and explain the reasoning behind each one:
A) Genoa was also a Muslim kingdom and its similar faith made it a natural ally: This option suggests that Mohammad the second continued to trade with the Genoese because they shared the same faith. However, it is important to note that Genoa was not a Muslim kingdom; it was actually a Catholic republic. Therefore, this option is incorrect.
B) The Genoese betrayed the Byzantines, so the Ottomans trusted them: This option suggests that the Ottomans trusted the Genoese because they had betrayed the Byzantines. However, this option assumes a specific historical event that may or may not be true. Without further context or historical evidence, it is difficult to determine the veracity of this statement. Therefore, this option is not a reliable explanation.
C) They were already trading partners: This option states that Mohammad the second continued to trade with the Genoese because they were already engaged in trade. This explanation is the most plausible and logical. If there was an established trade relationship between the Ottomans and the Genoese, it would be advantageous for Mohammad the second to maintain this economic connection, irrespective of the Genoese alliance with the Byzantines. Therefore, option C is the most likely correct answer.
In conclusion, Mohammad the second is likely to have continued trading with the Genoese because they were already trading partners (option C), rather than due to factors such as shared faith or the betrayal of the Byzantines (options A and B).