10. What did Gupta emperors do that allowed the empire to be peaceful?(1 point)
Responses
They removed the caste system and people could do any jobs
They removed the caste system and people could do any jobs
They refused to go to war with neighboring countries
They refused to go to war with neighboring countries
They allowed local leaders to rule villages (self-governing)
They allowed local leaders to rule villages (self-governing)
They punished harshly so people did not break laws
They allowed local leaders to rule villages (self-governing)
The Gupta emperors allowed local leaders to rule villages (self-governing).
To determine the correct answer, we need to understand the actions taken by Gupta emperors that contributed to peace in the empire. Let's analyze each response option:
1. "They removed the caste system and people could do any jobs"
Removing the caste system and allowing people to pursue any occupation does promote social equality and mobility. However, there is no historical evidence to suggest that the Gupta emperors specifically removed the caste system, so this option may not be accurate.
2. "They refused to go to war with neighboring countries"
Choosing to avoid conflict with neighboring countries can indeed contribute to a peaceful empire. However, it is essential to consider whether the Gupta emperors actually refrained from going to war. Historical accounts differ on this matter, so we cannot definitively conclude whether this option is correct.
3. "They allowed local leaders to rule villages (self-governing)"
Granting autonomy to local leaders and allowing them to govern their villages can lead to peaceful coexistence. This decentralized approach to governance might have been implemented by the Gupta emperors, making this option a possible explanation for the empire's peace.
4. "They punished harshly so people did not break laws"
Adopting a strict punitive system can act as a deterrent to prevent people from breaking laws. While this approach may promote obedience, it does not necessarily guarantee a peaceful empire.
Considering the options provided, the most plausible answer is option 3: "They allowed local leaders to rule villages (self-governing)." This practice of decentralization and giving power to local leaders could have contributed to stability and peace within the Gupta empire.