How did the Supreme Court decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey support the Tenth Amendment?
(1 point)
Responses
It gave women more right to privacy.
It gave women more right to privacy.
It reserved certain powers for state governments.
It reserved certain powers for state governments.
It kept doctors in charge of medical decisions.
It kept doctors in charge of medical decisions.
It made some crimes punishable by the federal government.
None of the provided responses accurately describe how the Supreme Court decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey supported the Tenth Amendment. The correct answer is: It reserved certain powers for state governments.
The Supreme Court decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey did not directly support the Tenth Amendment. The correct response among the given options is "It reserved certain powers for state governments." In this case, the Court upheld a Pennsylvania law that placed restrictions on abortion, stating that states have the power to regulate abortion as long as it does not place an "undue burden" on women seeking to have an abortion. This decision reaffirmed the principle of federalism, emphasizing that the states have the authority to regulate certain matters within their borders.
The Supreme Court decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey did not directly support the Tenth Amendment, which reserves certain powers for state governments. Instead, it primarily upheld the right to privacy established in the landmark case Roe v. Wade, while also modifying some of the rules regarding abortion.
To understand how the Supreme Court decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey supported the Tenth Amendment, we need to explore how it upheld the right to privacy and how that relates to states' powers.
Planned Parenthood v. Casey involved a challenge to a Pennsylvania law that imposed several restrictions on abortion. In its decision, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the constitutional right to choose to have an abortion, which was established in Roe v. Wade. The Court held that a woman has a constitutional right to make decisions about her own body, including the decision to have an abortion, without undue interference from the government.
In supporting the right to privacy, the Supreme Court recognized that the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause protects an individual's liberty interests, which include the right to make personal decisions regarding family, marriage, and procreation. This right to privacy is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, but the Court identified it as stemming from the overall structure of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Although the decision did not directly reference the Tenth Amendment, it did acknowledge that states have an interest in regulating abortion and that they can impose certain restrictions, as long as they do not impose an "undue burden" on a woman's right to choose. This standard gives states some leeway in regulating abortion, while also protecting the fundamental right to privacy.
In summary, while the Supreme Court decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey did not explicitly support the Tenth Amendment, it reaffirmed the right to privacy established in Roe v. Wade, and recognized that states have a legitimate interest in regulating abortion within certain boundaries. This recognition of state interests indirectly aligns with the principles behind the Tenth Amendment, which reserves powers to the states.