How long has the thermal power plant been in the locality?
Have people suffered respiratory problems because of the polluted air around the power plant?
What action would you suggest be taken to prevent the power plant from polluting the air?
A reporter wants to investigate the reasons for the high levels of air pollution in a locality. Initial research reveals two possible sources: an old thermal power plant and a sheet metal factory. She hands out the questionnaire above to the local residents to investigate the matter further.
What can be concluded about the results of her investigation?
Based on the questionnaire, the investigation reveals the following conclusions:
1. The duration of the thermal power plant's presence in the locality is unknown as the questionnaire does not ask for that information.
2. People in the locality have indeed suffered respiratory problems due to the polluted air around the power plant, as indicated by the second question on the questionnaire.
3. The questionnaire does not provide any specific suggestions or actions to prevent the power plant from polluting the air. Therefore, it cannot be concluded what actions should be taken based on the questionnaire alone.
4. The questionnaire does not provide information about the contribution of the sheet metal factory to the air pollution in the locality. Therefore, it is not possible to determine the extent of its impact without further investigation.
Based on the provided questionnaire and information, the reporter's investigation can draw the following conclusions:
1. Duration of the thermal power plant: The questionnaire does not provide information about the length of time the thermal power plant has been in the locality. Therefore, it is not possible to determine the duration from the questionnaire alone.
2. Respiratory problems: The questionnaire does not directly confirm if people have suffered respiratory problems due to the polluted air around the power plant. Further investigation, such as conducting interviews or analyzing health records, may be required to establish such a relationship.
3. Preventive actions: The questionnaire does not provide information on the suggested preventive actions to reduce air pollution from the power plant. Therefore, no conclusion can be made regarding the suggested preventive measures from the questionnaire alone.
Overall, the questionnaire alone does not provide conclusive evidence regarding the duration of the power plant, the impact on residents' respiratory health, or the suggested preventive actions. Further investigation is necessary to determine the causes of air pollution and its effects on residents' health in the locality.
To answer the reporter's investigation questions, we should first analyze the questionnaire responses from the local residents. Let's break down each question:
1. How long has the thermal power plant been in the locality?
To find the answer to this question, the reporter should review historical records, local government documents, or any available information about the establishment of the thermal power plant in that locality. Additionally, she could interview long-time residents who might have knowledge of when the plant was built.
2. Have people suffered respiratory problems because of the polluted air around the power plant?
To determine the impact of the power plant on residents' respiratory health, the reporter should collect data on the occurrence of respiratory problems in the area. This can be done by analyzing medical records, conducting interviews with healthcare professionals, and surveying the local population to understand if there is a correlation between living near the power plant and respiratory issues.
3. What action would you suggest be taken to prevent the power plant from polluting the air?
To address this question, the reporter should gather opinions and suggestions from the local community. She can do this by conducting interviews, hosting public meetings, or distributing surveys to gauge the views of the residents. This will help the reporter understand the potential solutions the residents want to see implemented.
Now, regarding the conclusion of the investigation, without the actual results of the questionnaire, it is not possible to determine the specific conclusion. The reporter must analyze and compile the responses from the local residents regarding the presence of the power plant, its impact on air pollution, and the recommended actions to prevent pollution. Based on the data collected, the reporter will be able to draw conclusions about the sources of pollution, the correlation between the power plant and respiratory issues, and the preferred measures to mitigate pollution.