what mostly made the malcontents different from other groups in colonial georgia
their land was no productive
they were denied religious freedom
the had trouble with the yamacraw indians
most of them paid their own way with little assistance
The correct answer is: they were denied religious freedom.
The malcontents in colonial Georgia were a group of settlers who were dissatisfied with the strict regulations and policies enforced by James Oglethorpe, who founded the colony in 1733. The malcontents objected to Oglethorpe's ban on alcohol, restrictions on trade, and limitations on land ownership.
However, among the various disagreements between Oglethorpe and the malcontents, the denial of religious freedom stood out as a particularly distinguishing factor. The malcontents were mainly Anglicans and wanted the freedom to practice their religion without Oglethorpe's limitations or interference. This set them apart from other groups in colonial Georgia who were mainly comprised of religious dissidents seeking refuge from persecution in other colonies.
The main factor that made the malcontents different from other groups in colonial Georgia was their difficulty in establishing productive land. Unlike other settlers who were able to cultivate their land successfully, the malcontents faced challenges in making their land productive, which resulted in economic struggles.
Another distinguishing factor for the malcontents was the denial of religious freedom. They faced restrictions and limitations on their ability to practice their desired religion, which caused discontent among the group.
Additionally, the malcontents had conflicts and troubles with the Yamacraw Indians. This strained their relationship with the native population and created further difficulties for their settlement.
Lastly, unlike many other settlers who received substantial assistance and financial support from the colony's trustees, most of the malcontents paid their own way with little assistance. This financial independence contributed to their distinct identity within colonial Georgia.
The malcontents in colonial Georgia differed from other groups for several reasons. One of the major distinctions was that their land was not productive. To understand this, you may refer to historical records, journals, or books that provide information on the economic activities and resources available in colonial Georgia. These sources will shed light on the challenges faced by the malcontents in terms of unproductive land, which could have limited their ability to sustain themselves economically.
Additionally, the malcontents were denied religious freedom. To confirm this, you can examine legal documents, court cases, or writings from the time period that discuss religious restrictions and regulations imposed in colonial Georgia. Such sources will provide insight into the limitations placed on religious expression and freedom for the malcontents and other groups.
Another point of distinction is that the malcontents had trouble with the Yamacraw Indians. This information can be corroborated through primary sources like letters, diaries, or official reports that detail interactions between the malcontents and the Yamacraw Indians. These sources will offer a better understanding of the conflicts, disputes, or challenges faced by the malcontents when it came to their relationship with the indigenous population.
Lastly, it is noteworthy that most of the malcontents paid their own way with little assistance. This can be confirmed through sources that provide information on the financial support received by various groups in colonial Georgia. Researching the financial records, government documents, or personal accounts of the malcontents will help assess the extent of external support they received, which will reveal their self-sufficient nature compared to other groups who may have relied more heavily on assistance.
By examining these historical sources and records, you can gain a comprehensive understanding of how the malcontents differed from other groups in colonial Georgia based on unproductive land, lack of religious freedom, conflicts with indigenous people, and their self-sufficiency.