going back to live in your parents house and havinf them support yoou financially from what perspwective on age would they not be considered to be 40 years old?
choose the correct answer from the options below
1. chronological
2. social
3. biological
4. none of the given options
2. social
The correct answer is: 1. chronological.
When considering whether someone should be considered as still dependent on their parents, the perspective is based on their chronological age. This refers to the number of years a person has lived since their birth. Therefore, the chronological age of the person is the relevant perspective in this scenario.
To determine from which perspective on age someone would not be considered to be 40 years old while living with their parents and being financially supported by them, we need to consider the options given:
1. Chronological age refers to a person's age based on the number of years they have been alive.
2. Social age refers to how a person is perceived and fits into societal norms and expectations for their age.
3. Biological age refers to a person's physical condition and changes within their body as they age.
Based on these options, none of them directly address the situation of living with parents and being financially supported. However, if we interpret the question in terms of social age, it can be argued that from a societal perspective, a person who is 40 years old and still relying on their parents for financial support may be seen as not meeting societal expectations or norms for their age. Therefore, the correct answer would be 2. Social.