Why were backcountry colonists more self-sufficient than plantation owners?
(1 point)
Responses
They had more slaves to help them.
They had more slaves to help them.
Farming along the coast provided everything they needed.
Farming along the coast provided everything they needed.
Living in the “breadbasket” provided them with enough money from their cash crops.
Living in the “breadbasket” provided them with enough money from their cash crops.
Nearly everything they needed was made at home.
Nearly everything they needed was made at home.
Nearly everything they needed was made at home.
The correct response is: Nearly everything they needed was made at home.
Backcountry colonists were more self-sufficient than plantation owners because they lived in remote areas away from urban centers and relied on their own resources to meet their needs. Living in the backcountry meant that they had limited access to markets and trade, so they had to produce most of what they needed themselves. This included farming, hunting, and gathering for food, as well as making their own clothing, tools, and other necessary items. They did not have the luxury of relying on cash crops or slaves to meet their needs, so they had to be self-reliant and self-sufficient.