A student is writing an argumentative essay about adopting shelter animals instead of buying pets. Which detail would not be relevant to the argument? (1 point)

Many dogs and cats need homes. Animals from pet stores are often unhealthy. Adopting shelter pets helps save lives.

Cats are more popular pets than dogs.

Cats are more popular pets than dogs.

The detail that cats are more popular pets than dogs would not be relevant to the argument. The argument is centered around adopting shelter animals instead of buying pets, regardless of whether cats or dogs are more popular.

To determine which detail would not be relevant to the argument about adopting shelter animals instead of buying pets, we need to analyze the purpose of the argument. The main focus of the argument is to emphasize the benefits of adopting shelter animals, such as saving lives and providing homes to animals in need. Therefore, the detail "Cats are more popular pets than dogs" would not be directly relevant to the argument, as it does not provide support for the main point. While it is true that cats are more popular, this information does not contribute to the argument's objective of promoting the adoption of shelter animals.