In this experiment, a ball rolls down a hill and hits a cup at the bottom. The hypothesis for investigation 2 predicted if the starting %0D%0A of the ball is increased, its kinetic energy at the bottom of the hill will be %0D%0A. The data showed that the ball with lower starting height would move the cup at the bottom of the ramp a distance of %0D%0A. The data showed that the ball with a higher starting height would move the cup at the bottom of the ramp a distance of %0D%0A. This means increasing the starting height of the ball will %0D%0A the kinetic energy of the ball at the bottom of the ramp. The hypothesis was %0D%0A.
In this experiment, the hypothesis for investigation 2 predicted that if the starting height of the ball is increased, its kinetic energy at the bottom of the hill will be higher.
The data showed that the ball with a lower starting height would move the cup at the bottom of the ramp a shorter distance.
The data also showed that the ball with a higher starting height would move the cup at the bottom of the ramp a longer distance.
This means that increasing the starting height of the ball will increase the kinetic energy of the ball at the bottom of the ramp.
Therefore, the hypothesis was supported.
To analyze this experiment, it seems like there are missing values for the predicted kinetic energy of the ball at the bottom of the hill and the distance the cup is moved for both the lower and higher starting heights.
However, based on the information provided, we can still draw a conclusion regarding the effect of increasing the starting height of the ball on its kinetic energy at the bottom of the ramp.
If the data showed that the ball with the lower starting height moved the cup a certain distance, we can infer that the kinetic energy of the ball at the bottom of the ramp was less compared to the ball with the higher starting height.
Therefore, if the ball with the higher starting height moved the cup a greater distance, it implies that the kinetic energy of the ball at the bottom of the ramp was higher.
Thus, based on this information, we can conclude that increasing the starting height of the ball will increase the kinetic energy of the ball at the bottom of the ramp. However, without specific data values, we cannot determine the exact relationship between the starting height and the kinetic energy.
To answer this question, we need to look at the provided information. It seems that some parts of the hypothesis, data, and conclusion are missing due to the presence of "%0D%0A" characters, which are URL encoded line breaks. However, I can still explain how to determine the answer once the missing information is provided.
1. Hypothesis for Investigation 2:
The hypothesis stated that if the starting height of the ball is increased, its kinetic energy at the bottom of the hill will be (increase/decrease/stay the same).
To investigate this hypothesis, you would need to perform the experiment multiple times with different starting heights of the ball. Then, measure the kinetic energy of the ball at the bottom of the hill for each starting height.
2. Data:
The data showed that the ball with a lower starting height moved the cup at the bottom of the ramp a distance of (missing value).
The data also showed that the ball with a higher starting height moved the cup at the bottom of the ramp a distance of (missing value).
3. Conclusion:
Based on the data, we can determine whether increasing the starting height of the ball has an effect on its kinetic energy at the bottom of the ramp. Unfortunately, the distance values (%0D%0A) which should be provided are missing, so we cannot draw a conclusion at this moment.
Once the missing information is provided, we can analyze the data and determine if increasing the starting height of the ball indeed affects its kinetic energy at the bottom of the ramp.