What would happen if you reversed the order of paragraphs 3 and 4
A: the extent of the problem would be lost on the readers because they would not receive all the data
B: the importance of the problem would become clearer because the worldwide impact would be centered sooner
C: The focus of the article would shift from old statistics to trends in the industry
D: the broader implications of an idea would be discussed before the reader understands what the idea is
D: the broader implications of an idea would be discussed before the reader understands what the idea is
If you were to reverse the order of paragraphs 3 and 4 in an article, several things could happen:
1. The extent of the problem would be lost on the readers because they would not receive all the data (Option A). By moving paragraph 3 before paragraph 4, the readers would not have access to the relevant information needed to understand the problem in its entirety.
2. The importance of the problem would become clearer because the worldwide impact would be centered sooner (Option B). By placing the paragraph discussing the worldwide impact before the other paragraphs, the readers would be able to understand the significance of the problem sooner.
3. The focus of the article would shift from old statistics to trends in the industry (Option C). Since paragraph 3 likely contains statistical data, by placing it before paragraph 4, the article's focus would shift from discussing old statistics to analyzing current trends in the industry.
4. The broader implications of an idea would be discussed before the reader understands what the idea is (Option D). If paragraph 4 contains the idea being discussed, by moving it after paragraph 3, the readers would encounter the broader implications of the idea before fully comprehending what the idea itself entails.
If you were to reverse the order of paragraphs 3 and 4, the effect it would have on the overall article would depend on the content and context of those paragraphs. Let's analyze the potential outcomes for each option:
A: If the extent of the problem is discussed in paragraph 3 and the data supporting it is presented in paragraph 4, reversing their order would mean that readers would first encounter the data without any context or understanding of the problem. As a result, paragraph 3 would lose its significance, and the readers wouldn't fully comprehend the issue at hand. Therefore, option A is a possible outcome.
B: If the worldwide impact of the problem is discussed in paragraph 3 and the importance of the problem is emphasized in paragraph 4, reversing their order would mean that readers would first learn about the global consequences before fully understanding the problem itself. This change could actually make the importance of the problem more apparent to readers, as they would be introduced to its wider scope early on. Thus, option B is a possible outcome.
C: If paragraph 3 focuses on old statistics and paragraph 4 delves into industry trends, reversing their order would lead to a shift in the article's focus. The readers would first encounter the more up-to-date information about trends in the industry before being introduced to the historical statistics. Consequently, the article's emphasis would move from discussing outdated information to exploring current developments. This change aligns with option C.
D: If the broader implications of an idea are explored in paragraph 3 and the idea itself is explained in paragraph 4, reversing their order would mean that the readers would first encounter the discussion of broader implications before fully understanding what the idea actually is. This change could lead to confusion or a lack of clarity, as readers would be introduced to the consequences before having the necessary background information. Therefore, option D is a possible outcome.
In conclusion, the specific outcome of reversing the order of paragraphs 3 and 4 would depend on the content of those paragraphs. It could result in the loss of the problem's extent for the readers (option A), a clearer understanding of the problem's importance due to earlier mention of its global impact (option B), a shift in focus from old statistics to recent industry trends (option C), or a discussion of broader implications without the prior understanding of the idea (option D).