which of the following best explains why shouldnt a business improve efficency by laying off the oldest and therefore highest paid employees
this action gives unrealistic hope to those who remain
this action given employees too many choices
this action violates the WARN act
this action discriminates illegally
The following options are best explained why a business shouldn't improve efficiency by laying off the oldest and therefore highest-paid employees:
1. This action gives unrealistic hope to those who remain: Laying off long-term, higher-paid employees to improve efficiency may create a false sense of security among the remaining employees. They may believe their jobs are safe, only to be let go later. This can lead to reduced morale and trust within the company.
2. This action violates the WARN Act: The WARN (Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification) Act is a federal labor law in the United States that requires employers to provide advance notice of mass layoffs or plant closures. If a business lays off a significant number of employees, including older and higher-paid ones, without complying with the WARN Act, they may face legal consequences.
3. This action discriminates illegally: Age discrimination is prohibited by various laws in many countries, such as the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) in the United States. Laying off older employees solely based on their age or compensation violates these anti-discrimination laws, potentially resulting in legal implications for the business.
In summary, these options highlight ethical, legal, and discriminatory concerns associated with laying off older and higher-paid employees solely for the purpose of improving efficiency.
The best explanation for why a business shouldn't improve efficiency by laying off the oldest and highest-paid employees is that this action violates the WARN Act. The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act is a US labor law that requires employers with more than 100 employees to provide at least 60 days' notice before laying off a significant number of workers. This act is in place to protect employees from sudden job loss and give them time to seek alternative employment or training opportunities. Laying off older employees based on their age and higher wages can be considered age discrimination, which is illegal and against the law. Therefore, such actions would violate the WARN Act and could lead to legal consequences for the business.
The best explanation for why a business shouldn't improve efficiency by laying off the oldest and highest-paid employees is because this action violates the WARN act and may also constitute illegal discrimination.
To verify this answer, let's break down the options provided:
1. "This action gives unrealistic hope to those who remain": While this statement may be true, it does not specifically address the illegality or ethical concerns related to laying off older employees. Therefore, this option is not the best explanation for why the business shouldn't lay off older employees.
2. "This action gives employees too many choices": This statement does not directly relate to the issue of laying off older employees or the potential violation of laws. Thus, this option does not provide the best explanation for why the business should refrain from this practice.
3. "This action violates the WARN act": The WARN act, which stands for Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, requires companies to provide advance notice to employees and their representatives before implementing mass layoffs or plant closures. If a business were to lay off employees without adhering to these guidelines, they would be in violation of the WARN act. This option presents a strong explanation as it aligns with the legal aspect of the question.
4. "This action discriminates illegally": This option directly addresses the issue of potentially illegal discrimination. Under employment laws, age discrimination is prohibited, meaning that businesses cannot treat older employees unfairly based on their age alone. Therefore, this option is a valid explanation for why a business should not lay off older employees.
Considering the explanations provided, the best option is that laying off the oldest and highest-paid employees would violate the WARN act and potentially result in illegal discrimination.