In 1–2 sentences, analyze the advantages and disadvantages of lifetime tenure for Supreme Court justices.(2 points)
Lifetime tenure for Supreme Court justices can provide stability and independence in decision-making, but it may also lead to entrenched ideologies, lack of accountability, and potentially outdated interpretations of the Constitution.
The advantages of lifetime tenure for Supreme Court justices include insulating them from political pressure and ensuring judicial independence, while the disadvantages include potential lack of accountability and the possibility of justices becoming out of touch with societal changes over time.
The advantage of lifetime tenure for Supreme Court justices is that it insulates them from political pressures and allows them to make impartial decisions, while the disadvantage is that it can lead to justices serving for long periods of time, potentially resulting in outdated perspectives and a lack of diversity on the court.
To form this response, I first identified the key advantages and disadvantages of lifetime tenure for Supreme Court justices. Next, I summarized each point in a concise manner while providing a brief explanation for clarity.