Why was written language likely developed?(1 point)

A It provided law codes for the public.
B It gave soldiers a common way to communicate military instructions prior to battle.
C It allowed trade over long distances.
D It allowed ritualistic prayers to be written for all to read.

C It allowed trade over long distances.

C It allowed trade over long distances.

To determine why written language was likely developed, we can examine each option and assess its significance.

A) It provided law codes for the public: While written language does play a crucial role in creating and sharing laws, it is unlikely to be the primary reason for the development of written language. Law codes are generally more complex and specific, and therefore might have been developed later on as societies grew more complex.

B) It gave soldiers a common way to communicate military instructions prior to battle: This is a plausible reason for the development of written language. By having a standardized system of written communication, military instructions could be accurately and efficiently conveyed to soldiers, which would have been advantageous in organizing troops and executing strategies.

C) It allowed trade over long distances: This is another plausible reason. In ancient times, long-distance trade was vital for economic growth and cultural exchange. Written language would have enabled merchants to record transactions, document deals, and communicate important information across great distances.

D) It allowed ritualistic prayers to be written for all to read: While written language can certainly facilitate the recording and dissemination of religious texts, this is unlikely to have been the primary catalyst for its development. Religion and rituals were typically woven into the fabric of societies before writing systems emerged.

Taking all of this into consideration, both options B (military communication) and C (long-distance trade) are likely contributing factors to the development of written language. However, it is difficult to determine which factor is the primary reason without further historical evidence.