Which of the following might a limited government be more likely to do than an unlimited government?
(1 point)
• build and maintain public roads
© protect citizens from attack
O operate public schools
• let citizens speak freelv and protest
• let citizens speak freely and protest
A limited government would be more likely to let citizens speak freely and protest than an unlimited government.
To determine which of the following actions a limited government is more likely to do than an unlimited government, we need to understand the concept of limited government.
Limited government refers to a system where the powers and actions of the government are restricted by law, usually outlined in a constitution or similar document. This means that the government's authority is limited, and it cannot arbitrarily exercise control over its citizens. In contrast, an unlimited government has unrestricted power and can take actions without legal restrictions on its authority.
Now, let's analyze the options:
1. Build and maintain public roads: Both limited and unlimited governments can undertake infrastructure projects like building and maintaining public roads. However, limited governments often have limited funds and prioritize essential public services, such as healthcare or education, above infrastructure development. So, while a limited government may still invest in public roads, it might do so to a lesser extent than an unlimited government.
2. Protect citizens from attack: Protecting citizens from attack is a fundamental responsibility of any government, whether limited or unlimited. This action is necessary to ensure the safety and security of the people. Therefore, both types of governments are likely to take measures to protect their citizens from external threats.
3. Operate public schools: The operation of public schools can vary depending on the government's role in education. In some countries, governments play a more significant role in education, including the operation of public schools. However, limited governments tend to prioritize personal freedoms and limited intervention in citizens' lives. Therefore, it might be more common for limited governments to support private education or provide vouchers for education rather than directly operating public schools.
4. Let citizens speak freely and protest: Protecting the freedom of speech and the right to protest is a characteristic of limited governments. These governments prioritize individual liberties and limit their interference in citizens' freedom of expression and assembly. Conversely, an unlimited government might impose restrictions on speech and protest to maintain control and suppress dissent.
Based on the analysis, the option "Let citizens speak freely and protest" is more likely to be associated with a limited government than an unlimited government.