Those who support increasing the power of the national government over the states would most likely support which of the following justifications of increasing the power of the national government?(1 point) Responses Increasing the power of the national government has decreased the power the national government exercises over the states. Increasing the power of the national government has decreased the power the national government exercises over the states. Increasing the power of the national government has promoted more equality in the U.S. Increasing the power of the national government has promoted more equality in the U.S. Increasing the power of the national government has reduced the national government’s control of interstate commerce. Increasing the power of the national government has reduced the national government’s control of interstate commerce. Increasing the power of the national government has given states more flexibility in solving problems.

Increasing the power of the national government has promoted more equality in the U.S.

Those who support increasing the power of the national government over the states would most likely support the justification that increasing the power of the national government has promoted more equality in the U.S.

To determine which justification of increasing the power of the national government would be supported by those in favor, we need to evaluate each option:

1. "Increasing the power of the national government has decreased the power the national government exercises over the states." This statement seems contradictory, as increasing power would typically imply an increase in control, not a decrease. Therefore, this justification is not logical.

2. "Increasing the power of the national government has promoted more equality in the U.S." This justification suggests that increasing national power has led to more equal treatment among states or individuals. If someone supports greater centralization of power, it is likely because they believe it will help to level the playing field and reduce disparities across the country.

3. "Increasing the power of the national government has reduced the national government's control of interstate commerce." This justification indicates that increasing national power has actually resulted in a reduction in the government's control over interstate commerce. However, this may not be a strong argument for those who support further centralization, as they might prefer increased control over such economic activities.

4. "Increasing the power of the national government has given states more flexibility in solving problems." This justification implies that by increasing national power, states are granted more flexibility to address issues and find solutions. While this may be seen as a positive outcome, it does not necessarily align with advocating for increased national power.

Based on the explanations provided, option 2, "Increasing the power of the national government has promoted more equality in the U.S.," would most likely be supported by those in favor of increasing the power of the national government.